The effect of cellular telephone conversation and music listening on response time in braking

Bellinger, David B.; Budde, Bradley M.; Machida, Moe; Richardson, Gary B.; Berg, William P.

doi:10.1016/j.trf.2009.08.007

Cited by 74 publications

(66 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Several simulator-based and real experiment studies show that getting involved in nonvisual secondary tasks affects driving performance by distracting the drivers' attention (Bellinger et al, 2009;Fagerström and Lisper, 1977;Green, 2001;Haigney et al, 2000;Reimer et al, 2011;Schreiner et al, 2004). In addition, naturalistic data from a study including 100 cars showed that 78% of the crashes and 65% of near crashes were due to some form of inattention, with a majority due to secondary task distraction (Dingus et al, 2006;Neale et al, 2005).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In general, engaging in various types of auditoryvocal secondary tasks including listening to audio systems, talking to other passengers, or conversing on hands-held and hands-free cell phones are common activities during driving. These activities may affect the driver's performance (Bellinger et al, 2009;Dibben and Williamson, 2007;Salvucci et al, 2007;Ünal et al, 2013). However, it seems drivers are able to compensate their driving performance, for example, by reducing the driving speed to meet the enhanced demand of dual-task conditions (Young and Lenné, 2010).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The effects of cognitively demanding dual-task driving condition on elderly people’s driving performance; Real driving monitoring

Ebnali¹,

Ahmadnezhad

Shateri

et al. 2016

Accident Analysis & Prevention

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effects of cognitively demanding dual-task driving condition on elderly people’s driving performance; Real driving monitoring

Ebnali¹,

Ahmadnezhad

Shateri

et al. 2016

Accident Analysis & Prevention

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Reaction time included processing of information and attention properties, whereas movement time was related to muscle contraction (35). It seems that HFPC delays the process of decision making rather than delaying motor response.…”

Section: U N C O R R E C T E D P R O O Fmentioning

confidence: 99%

Do Hands-Free Cell Phone Conversation While Driving Increase the Risk of Cognitive Distraction Among Drivers? A Cross-Over Quasi-Experimental Study

Sadeghian

Karbakhsh

Saremi

et al. 2018

Iran Red Crescent Med J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Background: Conversation over the cell phone while driving is a known risk factor for road traffic crash. Using handsfree to talk on the cell phone may remove visual and manual distraction yet not the cognitive distraction. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to better understand the mechanisms of cognitive distraction due to hands-free cell phone conversation (HFPC) while driving. Methods: Twelve male and 12 female University students in Tehran, Iran, were selected via the consecutive convenient sampling method, and randomly assigned to one of the following administrations of cross-over quasi-experimental study design, during year 2016: Administration 1, participants performed the tests while involved in HFPC, took rest for 60 minute, and then performed the tests another time without HFPC; Administration 2, participants performed the tests without HFPC, took rest, and then performed the tests another time with HFPC. Each participant moved to the other administration after 7 to 10 days. The Vienna test system (VTS) was used to measure simple and choice reaction time, selective attention, visual orientation, and visual memory. Linear regression analysis was used to study the change in test scores due to HFPC.

show abstract

“…18 A driver who must focus on driving while talking on the phone has a reduced response time, regardless of whether he or she is using a hands-free device. 19 National and international studies have also found that drivers who use a cell phone while driving are at 4 times greater risk of having an MVC then those who do not. 20,21 Prevention tips regarding cell phone use include the recommendation of limited use while driving.…”

Section: Motor Vehicle Crashesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evidence-Based Practice in Primary Prevention of Spinal Cord Injury

Bellon

Kolakowsky-Hayner

Chen

et al. 2013

Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A spinal cord injury (SCI) not only causes paralysis, but also has long-term impact on physical and mental health. There are between 236,000 to 327,000 individuals living with the consequences of SCI in the United States, and the economic burden on the individuals sustaining the injury, their support network, and society as a whole is significant. The consequences of SCI require that health care professionals begin thinking about primary prevention. Efforts are often focused on care and cure, but evidencebased prevention should have a greater role. Primary prevention efforts can offer significant cost benefits, and efforts to change behavior and improve safety can and should be emphasized. Primary prevention can be applied to various etiologies of injury, including motor vehicle crashes, sports injuries, and firearm misuse, with a clear goal of eliminating unnecessary injury and its life-changing impact.

show abstract

The effect of cellular telephone conversation and music listening on response time in braking

Cited by 74 publications

References 42 publications

The effects of cognitively demanding dual-task driving condition on elderly people’s driving performance; Real driving monitoring

The effects of cognitively demanding dual-task driving condition on elderly people’s driving performance; Real driving monitoring

Do Hands-Free Cell Phone Conversation While Driving Increase the Risk of Cognitive Distraction Among Drivers? A Cross-Over Quasi-Experimental Study

Evidence-Based Practice in Primary Prevention of Spinal Cord Injury

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About