1989
DOI: 10.1016/0148-2963(89)90053-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of Chernobyl on electric-utility stock prices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All these estimates are statistically significant at the 1% level. 12 It could be argued that the CAAR t metric is difficult to interpret since bigger firms should incur a lower drop in percentage terms. Therefore, in unreported results, in addition to the equally weighted CAAR t , we also computed the valueweighted CAAR t (see [11]).…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All these estimates are statistically significant at the 1% level. 12 It could be argued that the CAAR t metric is difficult to interpret since bigger firms should incur a lower drop in percentage terms. Therefore, in unreported results, in addition to the equally weighted CAAR t , we also computed the valueweighted CAAR t (see [11]).…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This test, however, attributes more weight to observations of firms with a high variance in returns, and is therefore more sensitive to distortions from very noisy observations. 12 Cumulative abnormal returns ðCAR i;t Þ for each accident are available at JEEM's online archive at supplementary material, which can be accessed at http://aere.059/journals/. In unreported results, we computed cumulative average abnormal returns using different event window lengths.…”
Section: Long-term Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, nuclear-related firms exhibited greater losses than non-nuclear firms. In contrast to Bowen, Castanias, and Daley (1983) who considered TMI, Fields and Janjigian (1989) did not find statistically significant changes in systematic risk, total risk, or market risk. Another study, which researched whether daily stock returns of U.S. electric utilities reacted to the Chernobyl nuclear catastrophe is the one by Kalra, Henderson jr., and Raines (1993), who grouped firms by their nuclear capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…In particular, firms with nuclear-generating capacity show a larger step-up in the risk premia following the TMI event than non-nuclear utility bonds. Fields and Janjigian (1989) studied the U.S. public electric utility stock price reaction to the Chernobyl nuclear power plant disaster. During a 20-day period after the accident, they found statistically significant, negative daily abnormal returns for all firms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%