The effect of China’s new cooperative medical scheme on health expenditures among the rural elderly

Abstract

BackgroundThe alarming progression of an increasingly aging population in China has attracted much attention within the country and abroad. In 2003, the Chinese central government launched the New Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) to resolve problems of healthcare inequity in regions with inadequate infrastructure and relative poverty. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of NCMS on health expenditures by the Chinese rural elderly population.MethodsThe data were obtained from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS), which was conducted in 2005, 2008, 2011 and 2014. Elderly people living in rural areas and 60 years old or above were screened for the investigation. The sample size was 7472 in 2005, 11,705 in 2008, 9239 in 2011, and 6059 in 2014. The OOP% and reimbursement ratio were the medical expenses paid by individuals accounting for their per capita annual income and the medical expenses paid by medical insurance accounting for their total medical expenses, respectively. By controlling for individuals’ sociodemographic characteristics, pensions, demands and utilization of health services, we estimated the effect of the NCMS on the OOP% and reimbursement ratio for the rural elderly using seemingly unrelated regression (SUR).ResultsThe NCMS coverage ranged from 11.63% in 2005 to 80.34% in 2014. The medical expenses of the elderly also increased from an average of $204.77 in 2005 to $696.23 in 2014, which was more than three times as much as in 2005. From 2005 to 2014, the reimbursement ratio for medical expenses of rural elderly people with NCMS increased significantly from 30.6% in 2005 to 56.1% in 2014. The proportion of reimbursement ratio for rural seniors with NCMS increased by 6.4% across each survey cycle (every 3 years). However, the NCMS resulted in an insignificant decrease in OOP% by 1.4% across each survey cycle (every 3 years). Among other medical insurances, public insurance and private elder insurance had significant positive impacts on reimbursement ratio but did not influence OOP%.ConclusionsNCMS remarkably increased the rural elderly’s reimbursement ratio but insignificantly decreased the rural elderly’s OOP%. In addition, the proportion of reimbursement ratio for NCMS participants increased by 6.4% every 3 years. Lower outpatient reimbursement, migration, limited reimbursement scope, an increasing demand for medical services and the rapid growth of medical expenses may be reasons for the gaps between the nominal reimbursement ratio and the actual reimbursement ratio and OOP%. Policymakers should further modify NCMS policies in rural China.

Study on the Utilization of Inpatient Services for Middle-Aged and Elderly Rural Females in Less Developed Regions of China

“…At present, this system has been merged with the basic medical care system for urban residents and is constantly being improved [31]. Findings from this study suggest to speed up the improvement of this medical security system, further improve its financing level and compensation scheme, so as to provide better medical protection for urban and rural residents [12,42].…”

China’s New Cooperative Medical Scheme’s Impact on the Medical Expenses of Elderly Rural Migrants

“…Based on the micro data from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS) [24], our focus is on the impact of the NCMS on the direct medical financial burden of rural elderly migrants. CLHLS data source can be found at https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/DSDR/studies/36179.…”

<p>The Effect of New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme on the Socioeconomic Inequality in Inpatient Service Utilization Among the Elderly in China</p>

“…9 The annual premium per capita has gradually increased from RMB 40 (US$ 4.88) in 2005 to RMB 400 (US$ 65.11) in 2014. 10 By the end of 2018, 130.38 million rural residents were covered by NRCMS. In terms of reimbursement policy, NRCMS provides financial protection by bearing a proportion of health expenditures.…”