1983
DOI: 10.1139/x83-138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of collector size on forest litter-fall collection and analysis

Abstract: Litter fall is commonly collected for a variety of ecological studies. This study was designed to test the effect of collector size on the precision of forest litter-fall estimates and on the time involved in laboratory sample sorting. Collectors varied in size from 0.010 to 0.933 m2 and were physically nested, the smaller units within larger units. Ten of these collector combinations were randomly placed on a 1-ha plot in a Douglas-fir/western hemlock (Pseudotsugamenziesii (Mirb.) Franco/Tsugaheterophylla (Ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both forest stands, thirty selfconstructed square litter traps (1 m × 1 m) were used to collect the litter fall at a height of 1 m above the ground level. The size and height of the litter traps were based on the fi ndings of McShane et al (1983) and Morrison (1991). The experimental set-up of the litter traps was concentrated around the spots where hemispherical photographs were taken (Fig.…”
Section: Collection Of Litter Fallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both forest stands, thirty selfconstructed square litter traps (1 m × 1 m) were used to collect the litter fall at a height of 1 m above the ground level. The size and height of the litter traps were based on the fi ndings of McShane et al (1983) and Morrison (1991). The experimental set-up of the litter traps was concentrated around the spots where hemispherical photographs were taken (Fig.…”
Section: Collection Of Litter Fallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The collectors were 20 ϫ 20 cm (0.04 m 2 ) with 5 cm high walls. McShane et al (1983) found that collectors between 0.010 and 0.933 m 2 can be used to estimate litterfall precisely, depending upon the objectives and other costs. The littertraps were made of plastic mesh (0.5 cm) and placed at ground level to obtain estimates of understory litterfall (includes grasses and herbs) as well as litterfall from aspen.…”
Section: Litter Trapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of spatial variation in litterfall mass have examined the effect of collector size (McShane et al. , Morrison , Búrquez et al. ), design (Búrquez et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies of sampling efficiency have focused more on characterizing leaf litter mass than chemistry. Studies of spatial variation in litterfall mass have examined the effect of collector size (McShane et al 1983, Morrison 1991, B urquez et al 1999, design (B urquez et al 1999), position (Welbourn et al 1981, Boerner andKooser 1989), and number (McShane et al 1983, Morrison 1991, B urquez et al 1999, Finotti et al 2003, Dellenbaugh et al 2007). Studies of temporal variation in litterfall mass have addressed seasonal and interannual variability (Gresham 1982, Stocker et al 1995.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%