2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.09.21.20198887
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of COVID-19 on the economy: evidence from an early adopter of localized lockdowns

Abstract: Background. Governments worldwide have implemented large-scale non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as social distancing or school closures, to prevent and control the growth of the COVID-19 pandemic. These strategies, implemented with varying stringency, have imposed substantial social and economic costs to society. As some countries begin to reopen and ease mobility restrictions, lockdowns in smaller geographic areas are increasingly being considered as an attractive policy intervention to mitigate societa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several socioeconomic, demographic, and political factors make control of the pandemic in Latin America particularly challenging [ 22 25 ]. Most countries in the region are now facing the stark social and economic costs imposed by large-scale non-pharmaceutical interventions while largely failing to control the epidemic's spread [ 13 , 24 , 26 ]. Despite these unique conditions, the region has received relatively little attention from researchers globally [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several socioeconomic, demographic, and political factors make control of the pandemic in Latin America particularly challenging [ 22 25 ]. Most countries in the region are now facing the stark social and economic costs imposed by large-scale non-pharmaceutical interventions while largely failing to control the epidemic's spread [ 13 , 24 , 26 ]. Despite these unique conditions, the region has received relatively little attention from researchers globally [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing the evolution of individuals in the same municipalities may alleviate concerns about localized lockdowns implemented at the municipality-level. These lockdowns may affect people differently, depending on the district where they live [6]. Although one can imagine several reasons why these two populations may differ, such as the type of employment, the magnitude of the difference shows that unemployment affected informal dwellers more severely.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mid-May, Greater Santiago (∼40% of the Chilean population) was put under lockdown, and by mid-June, half the population in Chile was under lockdown [40]. Research suggests that these mitigation strategies significantly slowed down epidemic growth [42] but generated a large drop in mobility and economic activity [6,43]. The reduction in economic activity does not affect all social groups in the same way, which calls for research on the impact on vulnerable populations such as those in informal settlements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inverse proportionality coefficient, the mitigation readiness H , determines the height of mitigation costs perceived by a society in units of the mortality rate. Delayed and accumulating impacts on societal, economic, and psychological well-being [ 55,53,56,54 ] and consequential shifts in prioritization are here captured by a steady decrease of H at the “degradation” rate r H , activated on the day t reset when net infection at low case numbers returns from a negative to a positive rate after the first lockdown, with reduction factor c H . The functional form derives from inverting (cf.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%