2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.phpro.2011.11.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Curing Temperature on Physical and Chemical Properties of Geopolymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
57
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
10
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compressive strength results, shown in Figure 12.5, indicate that increasing the curing temperature from room temperature to 70 C increases the compressive strength of the geopolymeric masonry bricks. Nevertheless, the compressive strength of geopolymeric masonry bricks slightly decreased from 18.9 to 17.4 MPa with an increase in the curing temperature from 70 to 80 C. The results from this research agreed with that of other researchers who also studied the effect of curing temperature on the properties of fly ash-based geopolymeric materials (Fareed, Muhd Fadhil, Samuel, & Nasir, 2011;Hardjito, Wallah, Sumajouw, & Rangan, 2004;Mustafa Al Bakri et al, 2011;Swanepoel & Strydom, 2002). Therefore, it can be concluded that the rate of geopolymerization reaction depends on the heat treatment for the strength development of geopolymeric masonry bricks.…”
Section: Influence Of Curing Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Compressive strength results, shown in Figure 12.5, indicate that increasing the curing temperature from room temperature to 70 C increases the compressive strength of the geopolymeric masonry bricks. Nevertheless, the compressive strength of geopolymeric masonry bricks slightly decreased from 18.9 to 17.4 MPa with an increase in the curing temperature from 70 to 80 C. The results from this research agreed with that of other researchers who also studied the effect of curing temperature on the properties of fly ash-based geopolymeric materials (Fareed, Muhd Fadhil, Samuel, & Nasir, 2011;Hardjito, Wallah, Sumajouw, & Rangan, 2004;Mustafa Al Bakri et al, 2011;Swanepoel & Strydom, 2002). Therefore, it can be concluded that the rate of geopolymerization reaction depends on the heat treatment for the strength development of geopolymeric masonry bricks.…”
Section: Influence Of Curing Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…4 and 5) show the typical amorphous hump in the XRD patterns at around 28 2θ° even after curing at 150 °C for up to 48 hr (Figure 4), as is also the case for the samples cured at 180 °C for up to 30 hr ( Figure 5). However, the XRD trace of sample cured for 48 hr at 180 °C (Figure 4) 7.23 (PDF# 01-085-0976), as well as quartz and minor amounts of anatase, the latter two being originally present in the metakaolin (Figure 1). …”
Section: X-ray Diffraction (Xrd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the different geopolymer materials, metakolin-and fly ash-based geopolymers activated by alkali were found to have an optimum curing temperature in air of 60 °C (6,7). However when these geopolymer samples were cured at temperatures >60 °C, the compressive strength decreased (7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However previous research shows that one of challenges in the application of low calcium fly ash based geopolymer as binder is its setting process needs relatively high curing temperature 60°C-120°C for 6 -24 hours [2][3][4][5][6][7]. This conditions limit the application of geopolymer for precast purposes whilst for normal concrete, the binder should be able to set in room temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%