1983
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1983.tb01304.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of different mixtures of NaCl and CaCl2 on the silver fir (Abies alba Miller)

Abstract: Young potted silver firs were treated with six different mixtures of N.iCl and CaCK. Growtli was measured as well as the fohar contents of Cl, Na and Ca and tlic development of chlorosis and necrosis was recorded. At both concentration levels used, growth inhibition and needle necrosis were more pronounced in test conditions rich in CaCl2, a fact which is prtibably duo to Cl toxicity. AbstractRing characteristics of pine trees grown in polluted air showed up distinctly as a decrease in newly devised synthetic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This was not observed in the second ex- servations, it appears that the replacement of Na § by Ca 2+ reduces the toxicity. This is in contrast with some observations on Abies (Von Sury and Fliickiger, 1983). An explanation for this contradiction lies certainly in the way the CaC12 treatment was applied by these authors.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was not observed in the second ex- servations, it appears that the replacement of Na § by Ca 2+ reduces the toxicity. This is in contrast with some observations on Abies (Von Sury and Fliickiger, 1983). An explanation for this contradiction lies certainly in the way the CaC12 treatment was applied by these authors.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…An explanation for this contradiction lies certainly in the way the CaC12 treatment was applied by these authors. When CaCI2 is given at an isoosmotical dose vs. NaCI, as it was done by Von Sury et al (1983), they also gave a 1.33 times more C1-. On the contrary, in our experiments the doses were isoequivalently calculated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%