SUMMARYThe effect of unfiitered versus filtered air was tested on tree seedlings at different sites with prevailing ozone pollution, at different altitudes. Growth and biomass data from different experiments were evaluated in relation to ozone dose above 40 nl T^ during the exposure time. In beech {Fagus sylvatica L.), biomass was significantly correlated with ozone dose whereas shoot length was not. There was no change in shoot/root ratio but there were more significant reductions in fine root biomass than in shoot biomass. The effect of ozone was cumulative within the duration of the experiments, i.e. from a few months to three years. A cumulative dose of 7 //I T' h > 40 nl 1"' per growing season, calculated for 24 h day"', corresponded to a 10% biomass reduction within three years. Seedlings grown in unfiitered air also exhibited much more severe symptoms of frost injury following a cold winter with rapid temperature change. Laboratory experiments suggest that winter desiccation may have played a more important role than low temperatures, but that medium frost temperatures may cause more latent injuries in seedlings exposed to ambient air. Water loss of detached leaves from unfiitered air was significantly higher later in the season. Both increased chlorosis and premature leaf fall were observed in the beech seedlings grown in unfiitered air, but in different years. The biomass of spruce \Picea abies (L.) Karst.] showed a tendency towards a reduction, but this was not significant within the dose range tested. Three years of fumigation, however, caused increased chlorosis also in the spruce seedlings. Tests with low temperatures suggest that the vitality of the spruce seedlings during winter may also be impaired by the ambient air pollution.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.