2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.116230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of different training frequency on bone mineral density in older adults. A comparative systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
5

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In parallel, against our expectation, with its close interaction of exercise parameters, the complexity of exercise might have also confounded our analysis of intensity progression and study duration. Since the methodologically correct approach for addressing this problem, i.e., trials with two exercise arms that differ only in the given component of interest (e.g., exercise frequency; [37]), was not available 4 in the domain of fracture reduction, corresponding exercise recommendations have to be derived from more dedicated metaanalyses in the area of osteoporosis [38][39][40] or fall reduction [2,41] or even better: from randomized controlled trials with similar or comparable training aims and cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel, against our expectation, with its close interaction of exercise parameters, the complexity of exercise might have also confounded our analysis of intensity progression and study duration. Since the methodologically correct approach for addressing this problem, i.e., trials with two exercise arms that differ only in the given component of interest (e.g., exercise frequency; [37]), was not available 4 in the domain of fracture reduction, corresponding exercise recommendations have to be derived from more dedicated metaanalyses in the area of osteoporosis [38][39][40] or fall reduction [2,41] or even better: from randomized controlled trials with similar or comparable training aims and cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also not clear from the literature as to how many impact loads are needed to elicit improvements in bone strength or enhance bone mass, structure, and geometry [ 94 ], but there is evidence that 50 (5 × 10) daily multi-directional impacts (hops) eliciting loads of 2.2 to 2.7 times body weight can improve in hip BMD [ 108 ]. In terms of exercise frequency, there is evidence from clinical trials [ 109 ] and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) [ 110 ] that two or more sessions per week are associated with the greatest benefits to bone. Furthermore, a meta-analysis of exercise intensity in postmenopausal women ( n = 53 trials) found that moderate to high intensity exercise was required for BMD improvement (total hip and lumbar spine BMD), with low intensity exercise and walking showing little-to-no effect [ 111 ].…”
Section: Exercise For Improving Bone Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Der positive Effekt von Training und körperlicher Aktivität auf das Auftreten von Stürzen und sturzbedingten Frakturen konnte in der Literatur entsprechend der gewählten Evidenzkriterien belegt werden [34]. Außerdem konnte bei bestimmten Trainingsformen ein positiver Effekt auf die Muskelkraft und den Körperfettanteil [35], insbesondere bei postmenopausalen Frauen hinsichtlich des messbaren Zielparameters auch auf die Knochendichte nachge wiesen werden [36,37].…”
Section: Empfehlungen Zu Körperlichem Trainingunclassified