TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435.
AbstractThis paper provides a comprehensive analysis of hole cleaning with drilling foam and conventional drilling fluids in inclined wells using a fluid mechanics approach without inertial effect. A simple experimental set-up was designed to study hole cleaning properties of various drilling fluids. Foams with controlled quality were generated and accurately characterized from a rheometrical point of view. These foams behave like shear thinning yield stress fluids and can be described by a Herschel-Bulkley law. Since rheological parameters depend on foam quality, a master rheological curve was obtained by using a volume equalization procedure and the specific volume expansion ratio ε (ratio of the specific volume of the foam to the specific volume of the liquid). Foams and conventional drilling fluids with various rheological characteristics were compared and their behavior regarding hole cleaning was highlighted. The effect of dimensionless parameters such as the Herschel-Bulkley number H b (ratio of the yield stress to the viscous stress), the specific volume expansion ratio ε and the flow characteristic time T * (ratio of the flow time to the residence time of a fluid particle) were investigated. The influence of hole angle, particles size and concentrations were also evaluated. On the one hand, for shear thinning yield stress fluids with the same yield stress and the same flow characteristic time, the higher the Herschel Buckley number, the better the efficiency of cuttings removal in laminar flow. Similarly, increasing the flow characteristic time T * enables better hole cleaning. On the other hand, for higher H b, foam hole cleaning ability is improved at high inclination and is better than with conventional drilling fluids. At these inclinations, "particles dead zones'' are observed and can explain the poor hole cleaning when using conventional drilling fluids. Efficient hole cleaning with foam was found to be strongly dependent on the specific volume expansion ratio ε. Specific inclinations at which the worst hole cleaning is obtained (i.e. 40° to 60°) appears to be a function of particle size and particle concentration initially present in the hole. In conclusion, Hb and characteristic time are good indicators of cuttings removal ability. Extrapolating those numbers to an ERD well would eventually provide an evaluation of the minimum circulating time necessary to remove cuttings.