The effect of elbow hyperextension on ball speed in cricket fast bowling

Abstract

This study investigates how elbow hyperextension affects ball release speed in fast bowling. A two-segment planar computer simulation model comprising an upper arm and forearm + hand was customised to an elite fast bowler. A constant torque was applied at the shoulder and elbow hyperextension was represented using a damped linear torsional spring at the elbow. The magnitude of the constant shoulder torque and the torsional spring parameters were determined by concurrently matching three performances. Close agreement was found between the simulations and the performances with an average difference of 3.8%. The simulation model with these parameter values was then evaluated using one additional performance. Optimising ball speed by varying the torsional spring parameters found that elbow hyperextension increased ball release speed. Perturbing the elbow torsional spring stiffness indicated that the increase in ball release speed was governed by the magnitude of peak elbow hyperextension and the amount that the elbow recoils back towards a straight arm after reaching peak elbow hyperextension. This finding provides a clear understanding that a bowler who hyperextends at the elbow and recoils optimally will have an increase in ball speed compared to a similar bowler who cannot hyperextend. A fast bowler with 20° of elbow hyperextension and an optimal level of recoil will have increased ball speeds of around 5% over a bowler without hyperextension.

The limits of aerial techniques for producing twist in forward 1½ somersault dives

“…The maximum joint angular velocities corresponding to the assumed minimum durations are lower than some values from the literature but this is probably a consequence of more rapid movement with flexed limbs than with straight limbs (Jessop & Pain, 2016) or a greater range of movement (Felton & King, 2016). Even so the lower bounds placed on the durations of arm and hip angle changes were based on actual performances and may possibly overestimate the minimum time needed for a joint movement.…”

Anthropometric and morphological characteristics of elite male cricket bowlers and batters over time: A systematic review

“…Based on the search criteria, only five full-member cricket nations have collected some form of data regarding the anthropometrical and morphological characteristics of elite male bowlers and batters. These nations include England (28 studies), 4,27–53 Australia (17 studies), 7,25,54–68 South Africa (five studies), 16,19,24,69,70 India (one study), 71 and Sri Lanka (one study). 72 Of the published research, most has focused on bowlers (45 studies), with a limited amount of literature directed around batters (12 studies).…”

A Review of Forward-Dynamics Simulation Models for Predicting Optimal Technique in Maximal Effort Sporting Movements

“…For passive restorative torques limiting shoulder flexion in the handspring somersault vault, Yeadon et al fit a similar function [122] to wrist and hip extension isovelocity data [121]. Finally, a viscoelastic spring has been used to incorporate elbow hyperextension in cricket fast bowling, with stiffness and damping parameters determined via an optimization algorithm to match recorded performances [13,123]. Scaling parameters during model evaluation may be the most appropriate way to attempt parameter individualization, given the potentially injurious nature of experimentally recording passive elastic restorative torques.…”