1982
DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(82)90350-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of endosonic and hand manipulation on the amount of root canal material extruded

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
53
0
5

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
53
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It was establish 1mm below the apical foramen as the working length, obtaining no significant differences in relation to debris extrusion [3]. On the other hand, grater debris extrusion once the apical foramen was selected as a reference point in comparison to 1mm below it using the single-file technique [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was establish 1mm below the apical foramen as the working length, obtaining no significant differences in relation to debris extrusion [3]. On the other hand, grater debris extrusion once the apical foramen was selected as a reference point in comparison to 1mm below it using the single-file technique [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 In 1988, Fairbourn and Walter found that sonic, ultrasonic and cervical flaring instrumentation techniques produced less debris than conventional filing technique. 9 In 1990, Douglas revealed that balanced force technique extruded significantly less debris than either endosonic or step back techniques.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uma das razões alegadas para a não utilização da patência apical é a possível extrusão de raspas ao longo do forame apical 4,[16][17][18] , condição relacionada principalmente à dor pós-operatória 19 , além de causar injúrias aos tecidos periapicais 20,21 . O conceito da patência é controverso para alguns profissionais 8 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified