2011
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mur004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Expectations and Expectancy Confirmation/Disconfirmation on Motorists' Satisfaction with State Highways

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
81
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
81
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the findings suggest the benefit of using estimates from evaluations as performance data. Previous studies of expectancy disconfirmation have cautioned governments that raising performance expectations will result in greater dissatisfaction among citizens if those expectations are not met (James, 2009;Poister & Thomas, 2011). The results here give rise to a parallel lesson for performance information use.…”
Section: Experiments 5: Expectancy Disconfirmationsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, the findings suggest the benefit of using estimates from evaluations as performance data. Previous studies of expectancy disconfirmation have cautioned governments that raising performance expectations will result in greater dissatisfaction among citizens if those expectations are not met (James, 2009;Poister & Thomas, 2011). The results here give rise to a parallel lesson for performance information use.…”
Section: Experiments 5: Expectancy Disconfirmationsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…A frequently evoked implication of this theory for public managers is the need to limit citizen expectations to avoid disappointment (van Ryzin, 2006;James, 2009;Poister & Thomas, 2011). How can governments shape expectations about performance?…”
Section: Expectation Disconfirmationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Link F, however, is less intuitive and refers to the direct effect of expectations on satisfaction, apart from disconfirmation. Some evidence suggests a negative direct effect (Poister & Thomas, ), consistent with the basic cognitive process of expectancy‐disconfirmation as the mechanism of performance perception. But other studies find a positive direct effect of expectations (Oliver & DeSarbo, ; Van Ryzin, ), which may seem counterintuitive at first glance.…”
Section: Expectancy‐disconfirmation Theorymentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Oliver (, ) focused on empirical expectations. Poister and Thomas (), following James (), specifically elicited normative expectations. James () examined both empirical and normative expectations.…”
Section: The Expectancy‐disconfirmation Model Of Citizen Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%