2007
DOI: 10.1177/1042391506064908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Fuel Quantity and Location on Small Enclosure Fires

Abstract: Results from an experimental program undertaken to study the effect of fuel quantity and location on ethanol pool fires in the open and in a small enclosure (an ISO 9705 room) are compared with simulations using the Fire Dynamics Simulator version 4.03 (FDS4). The fuel in trays is placed at three locations (front, back, and center) within the room enclosure as well as directly under the calorimeter hood. The measured heat release rate (HRR) is found to vary substantially when a fuel package consisting of diffe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
1
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
26
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This observations compares well with the test results obtained by Thomas et al [6] and Parkes [8] as in some of their experiments the free burn HRRs were larger than the room burn HRR. Mass loss rates found in the free burn tests and the predicted MLRs from Table 1 are compared in Table 6.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Experimental Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This observations compares well with the test results obtained by Thomas et al [6] and Parkes [8] as in some of their experiments the free burn HRRs were larger than the room burn HRR. Mass loss rates found in the free burn tests and the predicted MLRs from Table 1 are compared in Table 6.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Experimental Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…By isolating different parameters the models have listed the aspect ratio [12], the thermal inertia of lining [13,14] and the discharge coefficient [15] as parameters influencing the onset of flashover. Furthermore, the analyses generally mentioned that experimental validation was needed, which is in agreement with the fact that the CFD modeling in references [6,8,9] was unable to fully reproduce the results of the experimental tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As pointed out by the program developers [4], inherited limitations in the FDS liquid fuel model would generate problems. This limitation was also incorporated based on other research studies conducted by Smardz [33], Moghaddam et al [34], and Thomas et al [35]. Therefore, it is suggested that liquid fuel model should be applied carefully to engineering application.…”
Section: Grid Size Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental data reported by Steckler et al [8] originally for studying doorway flow have been used many times. Other works on verifying field models are on a specific fire scenario by Chow and Zou [9]; FDS for the prediction of medium-scale pool fires by Wen et al [10]; and comparing FDS4 combustion model by Thomas et al [11]. There are very few validations on using the model for large compartment fires [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%