1962
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1962.03615995002600020020x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Gamma Radiation on the Microbial Population of the Soil

Abstract: Arredondo fine sand was exposed to gamma radiation from a cobalt 60 source at doses of 1, 4, 16, 32, 64, 256, 512, 1024, and 2048 kiloroentgens (kr.). Percentage survival of fungi and bacteria decreased • wit h each increase in radiation dose to < 4% at 1024 kr. Algae were not as drastically reduced as bacteria and fungi: some survived at 2048 kr. and greatest reduction occurred above 64 kr. A few nematodes remained in the soil 2 days after irradiation with 1024 kr., but none were recoverable from doses > 256 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was the result of N flush and improved P availability. This was caused by the sterilization of a larger fraction of the soil microbiota by the higher dose, as shown by a higher share of N NH4+ in N soluble due to decreased nitrification (Popenoe and Eno 1962). Colonization rates were reduced by benomyl incorporation somewhat more than in former studies either in pots applied as a soil drench at sowing (Bailey and Safir 1978;Kough et al 1987), in the field applied as a drench of soil cores (Merryweather and Fitter 1996) or incorporated into soil (Lu and Miller 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This was the result of N flush and improved P availability. This was caused by the sterilization of a larger fraction of the soil microbiota by the higher dose, as shown by a higher share of N NH4+ in N soluble due to decreased nitrification (Popenoe and Eno 1962). Colonization rates were reduced by benomyl incorporation somewhat more than in former studies either in pots applied as a soil drench at sowing (Bailey and Safir 1978;Kough et al 1987), in the field applied as a drench of soil cores (Merryweather and Fitter 1996) or incorporated into soil (Lu and Miller 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Previous work on the effects of ionising radiation on soil microbial communities was mainly carried out at high doses (in the order of several kGy) designed to sterilise soil for the purpose of transportation between countries and for soil research experiments (McLaren, 1969;Johnson and Osborne, 1964). Some early studies did attempt to evaluate the effects of gamma radiation on indigenous microbial communities at doses in the range 10-400 Gy but these were mainly carried out on non-rhizosphere soil using only traditional culturing techniques (Davis et al, 1956;Stotzky and Mortensen, 1959;Popenoe and Eno, 1962;Skou, 1962). Soil microorganisms have recently been highlighted as potential reference organisms (see Pentreath and Woodhead, 2001) for consideration within frameworks for the protection of the environment from ionising radiation (Strand et al, 2001;Beresford et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stanovick, Giddens, and McCreery (1961) concluded that the symbiotic nitrogenfixing bacteria are more susceptible to neutrons and y rays than are other soil organisms. De-creases in bacterial and fungal populations, nitrification, and sulfate production in soils exposed to 7-radiation were observed by Popenoe and Eno (1962). Bernard and Geller (1962) reported that doses of y rays exceeding 15 kr were injurious to the soil microflora and that doses of 100 kr were lethal to Azotobacter and the nitrifying bacteria in sandy soils.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%