2009
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2009.968.972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Gender and Grade Level Differences on Achievement Goal Orientations of Iranian Undergraduate Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants' success orientations do not differ significantly according to class level. Studies of the Great Grand (2014), Odacı, Berber Çelik, Çikrıkcı (2013), Toğluk (2009), Tiryaki (2007), Fouladchang, Marzooghi & Shemshiri (2009) support our research results. In the study of Kayis (2013), he found a significant difference in the performance approach sub-dimension in favor of the 1 st grade students.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Participants' success orientations do not differ significantly according to class level. Studies of the Great Grand (2014), Odacı, Berber Çelik, Çikrıkcı (2013), Toğluk (2009), Tiryaki (2007), Fouladchang, Marzooghi & Shemshiri (2009) support our research results. In the study of Kayis (2013), he found a significant difference in the performance approach sub-dimension in favor of the 1 st grade students.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…According to the results, there was no significant difference between the performance-avoidance goal orientation scores of the students. Similar findings were found by Fouladchang et al (2009). They examined the AGO levels of Iranian undergraduate students, and revealed that the learning orientation scores of students were in favor of the fourth-year students.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In some studies, differences in AGO levels were discussed according to the grade level variable (e.g., Fouladchang, Marzooghi, & Shemshiri, 2009; Küçükoğlu et al, 2010). Differences created by academic achievement on AGO level became a subject of curiosity for researchers (e.g., Buluş, 2011; Coutinho, 2007; Elliot et al, 1999; Harackiewicz, Barron, Tauer, & Elliot, 2002; Nielsen, 2008).…”
Section: Purpose Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with previous research findings by researchers like Elizur & Beck (1994);Nagarathanamma & Rao (2007) and Kaushik & Rani (2005), this study found no significant difference in the need achievement motivation of male and female undergraduates. Although, Liu &Zhu (2009) andFouladchang et al(2009) found significant differences in achievement motivations of male and female students, cultural variance and the population sampled may have accounted for the difference in findings as observed. In other words, it is inferred that both male and female students do not significantly differ in their level of achievement motivation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Results showed students of science faculty had significantly higher achievement motivation in comparison to Social Science, Humanities and Commerce faculty, but it does not significantly differ from the vocational courses. Fouladchang et al(2009) with the purpose to investigate the effect of gender and grade level differences on goal orientations of undergraduate students in an Iranian university collected a sample of 302 Iranian students by random cluster sampling. It was found that males had a greater performance-approach goal orientation than females.…”
Section: Liu and Zhu (2009) Found Significant Differences In Achievemenmentioning
confidence: 99%