2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-8401(03)00003-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of genotype and dietary fibre level on the caecal bacterial enzyme activity of young piglets: digestive consequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
24
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
24
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, increased fibre level in the diet resulted in greater weight of the GIT (except for small intestine and caecum), in agreement with others (Freire et al, 2000 and2003;Len et al, 2009a), whereas the length of the GIT was unaffected by diet. However, there were no differences in the weight of the GIT between the diets HF-CR and HF-BG, which could be due to the small difference in soluble fibre content between the HF diets.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, increased fibre level in the diet resulted in greater weight of the GIT (except for small intestine and caecum), in agreement with others (Freire et al, 2000 and2003;Len et al, 2009a), whereas the length of the GIT was unaffected by diet. However, there were no differences in the weight of the GIT between the diets HF-CR and HF-BG, which could be due to the small difference in soluble fibre content between the HF diets.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Consequently, different breeds probably have different responses to diets in terms of nutrient digestibility and growth performance. The different response between breeds could be related to the development of the digestive capacity (Len et al, 2009a) and the composition of diets, especially dietary fibre (DF) level and fibre sources (Freire et al, 2003;Borin et al, 2005;Len et al, 2009a and2009b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Morales et al (2002) and Rivera-Ferre et al (2006) found lower TTAD coefficients for Iberian pigs (IB) when compared with Landrace pigs at the same stage of growth (fattening (90 to 110 kg BW) and post-weaning (25 to 35 kg BW) pigs, respectively), which may contribute to explaining the poorer nutrient utilization of the IB genotype. In other studies, higher TTAD coefficients of indigenous pigs has been related to differences in total weight of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT), in enzymatic and microbial activity of the gut and in digesta passage rate (Freire et al, 2003). Nevertheless, little information is available in the literature relating TTAD coefficients to micro-anatomical structure of the intestine, which is often referred to in studies on weaning piglets, in which the structural aspects of the intestine have not necessarily reached 'mature' morphology (Salgado et al, 2002;Liu et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Nevertheless, there is controversial -E-mail: jose.aguilera@eez.csic.es information on the digestive capacity of indigenous pig breeds compared with lean-type pigs. Some authors have reported higher TTAD coefficients in obese-type pigs compared with lean pigs (Fé vrier et al, 1992;Freire et al, 2003). In contrast, Morales et al (2002) and Rivera-Ferre et al (2006) found lower TTAD coefficients for Iberian pigs (IB) when compared with Landrace pigs at the same stage of growth (fattening (90 to 110 kg BW) and post-weaning (25 to 35 kg BW) pigs, respectively), which may contribute to explaining the poorer nutrient utilization of the IB genotype.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation