2002
DOI: 10.1088/0953-2048/15/7/311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of geometry on the trapped magnetic field in bulk superconductors

Abstract: We have studied the effect of geometry on the trapped magnetic field in bulk Y–Ba–Cu–O superconductors by varying the thickness. The trapped field first increased with increasing thickness of the bulk superconductor, and then saturated when the thickness reached a certain value. We have also performed simulation studies based on the sand-pile model and the Biot–Savart law, which were in fairly good agreement with the experimental results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There exist a number of different numerical techniques that have been applied variously to the modelling of superconducting materials [30,46], including the finite difference (FD) method [47], the combined sand-pile/Biot-Savart method [48][49][50][51], the Fourier Transform method [29], minimisation or variational techniques [52][53][54][55][56][57][58] and the finite element method (FEM). In general, FEM techniques are the most commonly used and developed methods, and these can be applied to superconducting material problems using a variety of formulations [30,59,60]: namely the A-V [61][62][63], T-Ω [64][65][66], H [67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78] and E [59,[79][80][81] formulations, and Campbell's equation [63,82].…”
Section: Numerical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There exist a number of different numerical techniques that have been applied variously to the modelling of superconducting materials [30,46], including the finite difference (FD) method [47], the combined sand-pile/Biot-Savart method [48][49][50][51], the Fourier Transform method [29], minimisation or variational techniques [52][53][54][55][56][57][58] and the finite element method (FEM). In general, FEM techniques are the most commonly used and developed methods, and these can be applied to superconducting material problems using a variety of formulations [30,59,60]: namely the A-V [61][62][63], T-Ω [64][65][66], H [67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78] and E [59,[79][80][81] formulations, and Campbell's equation [63,82].…”
Section: Numerical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation ( 3) has been applied variously to bulk superconductors in [97][98][99][100][101][102]. The material-dependent constants can be estimated via the trapped field profile of the bulk (for example, [97]) or by measurements of the magnetic moment hysteresis (m-H) loops of sub-specimens taken from the bulk (for example, [15,103,104]) at different temperatures.…”
Section: Understanding Flux Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. The trapped field saturates as the thickness, H, of the bulk approaches D, which can be deduced from (3) and (4), and is observed for bulk (RE)BCO superconductors [20], as well as bulk MgB 2 [10]. From these results, the geometry of the bulk can be optimised, and as found in [21] for bulk (RE)BCO superconductors, an aspect ratio of between 1 and 1.5 for R/H (radius/thickness) would also be an appropriate compromise between the accessible, surface trapped field and volume of superconducting material for bulk Ba122 magnets.…”
Section: Fixed Thickness Diameter Variationmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…1) generates a field B at any point P in space which can be derived by Biot-Savart law. Simple expressions for B components are derived in [5] or [7]. Bean model [8] is considered, meaning that current flowing in each loop is determined by constant critical current density of the sample, J C .…”
Section: A Sand Pile Modeling Of One Single Grainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous work, the force developed by an all superconducting linear motor was derived by averaging magnetic flux density of two trapped flux magnets over the volume of superconducting coils in the armature of the motor [4]. This flux density was calculated by means of sand pile model [5], where persistent currents are assumed to flow in concentric loops parallel to sample edges. Biot-Savart law is then used for straightforward calculation of flux density components in any point in space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%