2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Group Work on the Self-efficacy of Social Work Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Individual members were able to observe peers who performed tasks successfully as role models and that led them to develop greater self-efficacy. These results are consistent with Ontas & Tekindal [31], who found that group work positively affected the self-efficacy of learners. Further, results agreed with Bandura [7], who indicated that modeling was an effective tool for supporting one's sense of selfefficacy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Individual members were able to observe peers who performed tasks successfully as role models and that led them to develop greater self-efficacy. These results are consistent with Ontas & Tekindal [31], who found that group work positively affected the self-efficacy of learners. Further, results agreed with Bandura [7], who indicated that modeling was an effective tool for supporting one's sense of selfefficacy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…So, they are able to develop their cultural understanding of others and guarantee the learners to create more spaces for making more friends (Li & Campbell, 2008). Also, it could lead, build, and eventually contribute to higher self-esteem and care through better tolerance to other despite differences (Johnson & Johnson, 2000;Öntaş & Tekindal, 2015). Lastly, through a group assignment, students' personality is also positively affected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A escala é de natureza unifatorial e composta por dez itens, a serem respondidos em escalas tipo Likert de quatro pontos, variando de 1 (de modo nenhum é verdade) a 4 (exatamente verdade). Ela tem apresentado boas características psicométricas em diferentes países, como Portugal (Araújo & Moura, 2011), Turquia (Aypay, 2010), Suécia (Löve, Moore, & Hensing, 2012), Alemanha (Christoph et al, 2013), Estados Unidos (Lorente, et al, 2014) e Polônia (Kalandyk, Penar-Zadarko, & Krajewska-Kułak, 2016), além de sua estrutura ter se mostrado estável em estudos longitudinais (Schwarzer & Jerusalém, 1999e Vera, Salanova, & Lorente, 2012. Adicionalmente, a meta-análise realizada por Scholz, Doña, Sud e Schwaarzer (2002), com base em 25 estudos, confirmou a unidimensionalidade das diversas adaptações da escala, que apresentaram índices de consistência interna variando entre 0,75 e 0,91.…”
unclassified