2016
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/5/056014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of head-related filtering and ear-specific decoding bias on auditory attention detection

Abstract: This work shows the importance of using realistic binaural listening conditions and training on a balanced set of experimental conditions to obtain results that are more representative for the true AAD performance in practical applications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
106
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
7
106
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While Das et al. () report a drop of ~11% for the ‘other ear’ decoder this is likely to be the maximum effect for an ear bias as in that experiment the speakers were presented at ±90°.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While Das et al. () report a drop of ~11% for the ‘other ear’ decoder this is likely to be the maximum effect for an ear bias as in that experiment the speakers were presented at ±90°.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Nonetheless, our cross-decoding effects are quite large (drops by 9.4% and 23%) for a 30° angle of separation between speakers. While Das et al (2016) report a drop of ~11% for the 'other ear' decoder this is likely to be the maximum effect for an ear bias as in that experiment the speakers were presented at ±90°.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All data were split into 30 second trials and the EEG data were bandpass filtered between 1-9 Hz (the frequency range of most interest for tracking speech stimuli [16]- [18]), and down-sampled to 20 Hz. The EEG decoder was trained using all the recorded data, except the trial under test using the envelope extracted from the (known) attended speech stimulus.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TRFs not only have high temporal precision but are also sensitive to attentional modulation (Akram et al, 2017;Power et al, 2012). Forward modeling thus comes with the advantages of being able to investigate the TRFs and gain a better understanding of how our brain handles auditory stimuli Ding and Simon, 2012a,b), and also the possibility to identify the brain regions involved with stimulus processing (Das et al, 2016;Ding and Simon, 2012b;Etard et al, 2018;Power et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%