Various water soluble organic additives were used in ceria-based slurries to control both the silicon oxide and silicon nitride film removal rates. Our polish results and zeta potential data suggest that the additives with -diketonatelike structures can inhibit both oxide and nitride removal rates. We propose possible complexing between the additives and the ceria abrasives might be responsible for this removal rate inhibition.Since 0.25 m technology node and beyond, shallow trench isolation ͑STI͒ has replaced traditional LOCOS ͑local oxidation of silicon͒ to provide better device isolation. 1 In a typical STI process, silicon nitride and thermal oxide are sequentially deposited on Si and trenches are created between each active area by etching, and subsequently silicon dioxide ͑SiO 2 ͒ is deposited. Then the excess SiO 2 layer present on the active area is removed by chemical mechanical polishing ͑CMP͒ stopping on the silicon nitride, which acts as a protective layer on the active area. In the last step, the nitride film is removed by wet etching or polishing, leaving the trench-filled oxide to isolate the devices. 2,3 During the STI fabrication process, CMP is a key step which requires a complete removal of oxide and a minimal loss of the underlying nitride. Ceria-based slurries can preferentially remove the overburden oxide layer with minimal polishing of nitride in the presence of specific additives, which fits well with the requirements of the STI CMP process and has aroused much interest in recent years. 1,2Earlier, Ramanathan et al. 4 identified several ceria-based slurries which suppress the silicon nitride removal rates ͑RRs͒ without affecting silicon dioxide RRs using different acidic amino acids such as proline, glycine, glutamic acid, etc., as additives. Later, America and Babu 5 identified that proline suppresses the silicon nitride RRs more effectively when compared to the other amino acids at pH ϳ 9.7. They proposed that proline binds to the silicon nitride surface through a combination of hydrogen and bidentate bonding, and hinders its hydrolysis. In addition, Dandu et al. 6 recently showed that this proline film on the silicon nitride surface survives even after polishing for Ͼ5 min.Carter and Johns 7 reported that oxide to nitride removal selectivity could be varied by 3 orders of magnitude using different organic amines, acids, and amino acids as additives in ceria-based slurries at pH 5. They proposed that the nitride polishing could be influenced by the additives' basicity through a site-blocking mechanism, while the oxide RRs would be decreased by the additives which are likely to adsorb on either the oxide or the ceria surface by preventing direct Si-O − interactions with ceria. Later, Dandu et al. 6 observed that the silicon nitride RRs can also be suppressed using different cyclic amines as additives in ceria-based dispersions in the entire pH range 2-12. They proposed that these amines adsorb on the silicon nitride surface through H-bonding and, hence, prevent hydrolysis. Kim et al. 8 ...