The Effect of Including an Opt-Out Option in Discrete Choice Experiments

Abstract

Objectiveto determine to what extent the inclusion of an opt-out option in a DCE may have an effect on choice behaviour and therefore might influence the attribute level estimates, the relative importance of the attributes and calculated trade-offs.Methods781 Dutch Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus patients completed a questionnaire containing nine choice tasks with an opt-out option and nice forced choice tasks. Mixed-logit models were used to estimate the relative importance of the five lifestyle program related attributes that were included. Willingness to pay (WTP) values were calculated and it was tested whether results differed between respondents who answered the choice tasks with an opt-out option in the first or second part of the questionnaire.Results21.4% of the respondents always opted out. Respondents who were given the opt-out option in the first part of the questionnaire as well as lower educated respondents significantly more often opted out. For both the forced and unforced choice model, different attributes showed significant estimates, the relative importance of the attributes was equal. However, due to differences in relative importance weights, the WTP values for the PA schedule differed significantly between both datasets.ConclusionsResults show differences in opting out based on the location of the opt-out option and respondents' educational level; this resulted in small differences between the forced and unforced choice model. Since respondents seem to learn from answering forced choice tasks, a dual response design might result in higher data quality compared to offering a direct opt-out option. Future research should empirically explore how choice sets should be presented to make them as easy and less complex as possible in order to reduce the proportion of respondents that opts-out due to choice task complexity. Moreover, future research should debrief respondents to examine the reasons for choosing the opt-out alternative.

The status quo’s role in improving the estimation of willingness to pay in choice experiments

“…An additional benefit of this approach is that, during the data analysis, it is possible to perform a detailed analysis regarding status quo bias using the same sample of respondents, with answers collected at the same moment in time. This is arguably a more precise solution than using a split sample approach, as demonstrated by Veldwijk et al (2014), and it eliminates several external variables that could affect respondents if a testretest approach was used to implement the two choice experiments. One aspect that could be explored further is the potential contribution of this study to the body of literature that assesses the appearance of status quo bias and the factors that influence this phenomenon.…”

“…The manner in which the choice set incorporates the SQ option is similar to the approach presented by Veldwijk et al (2014). We first present the options (e.g.…”

Farmers’ Preferences for Cotton Cultivation Characteristics: A Discrete Choice Experiment in Burkina Faso

“…The first one refers to the baseline, meaning farmers could choose to continue their current way of growing cotton, while the second opt-out allowed farmers to indicate a preference for stopping growing cotton when compared to the other alternatives. Following Veldwijk et al [54], including an opt-out option in DCE leads to an unforced choice model, which may therefore induce a downward bias [55]. The choice sets were compiled by means of SAS (Statistical Analysis System software).…”

Bayesian estimation of hazard models of airline passengers’ cancellation behavior

“…given the option to choose either one of the scenarios portrayed or to choose none of the scenarios portrayed (Veldwijk et al, 2014). Hence, the individual "opts out" of choosing an available scenario or alternative.…”