2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of information transfer related to soil biodiversity on Flemish citizens' preferences for forest management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess the effects of balanced sustainability information on dairy farmers' preferences regarding attributes of more grass-based feeding systems, we used a between-subjects design, where respondents are randomly assigned into two groups: half to a treatment group and half to a control group. The design is better suited for our study setting where shorter surveys are more feasible and allows us to better reduce possible confounding between information treatment effects and learning or fatigue effects often associated with within-sample designs and longer surveys (Vanermen et al, 2021). We opted for equal allocation of respondents to treatment and control, and individual-level randomization to maximize power (Glennerster and Takavarasha, 2013).…”
Section: Treatment Randomizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the effects of balanced sustainability information on dairy farmers' preferences regarding attributes of more grass-based feeding systems, we used a between-subjects design, where respondents are randomly assigned into two groups: half to a treatment group and half to a control group. The design is better suited for our study setting where shorter surveys are more feasible and allows us to better reduce possible confounding between information treatment effects and learning or fatigue effects often associated with within-sample designs and longer surveys (Vanermen et al, 2021). We opted for equal allocation of respondents to treatment and control, and individual-level randomization to maximize power (Glennerster and Takavarasha, 2013).…”
Section: Treatment Randomizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the inclusion of an opt-out or status quo option is common practice in DCEs as it increases the realism of the choice task (Carson et al, 1994;Louviere, Hensher and Swait, 2000;Vanermen et al, 2021), we did not include an opt-out or status quo option in our choice experiment. This means that respondents are forced to make a choice between the three proposed scenarios.…”
Section: Design Of Dcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many years, stated preference reseachers have studied the effects of information on stated preferences, including information about the current state or the content, extent, expected outcomes, policy context or mechanism of the proposed policy change of the valuation scenario. The majority of the studies find that extending such information increases the value estimates for a range of environmental goods like forest and moorland 1 3 management, water quality, and species conservation (e.g., Hoevenagel and van der Linden 1993;Munro and Hanley 2001;Bateman and Mawby 2004;Rambonilaza and Brahic 2016;Vanermen et al 2021). Yet, the empirical evidence is not consistent.…”
Section: Information Effects Consequentiality and Credibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it delivers new insights into the frequently studied effects of the provision of additional information about the valuation scenario on stated preferences. Besides investigating how the commonly found information effects (e.g., Hoevenagel and van der Linden 1993;Munro and Hanley 2001;Bateman and Mawby 2004;Rambonilaza and Brahic 2016;Vanermen et al 2021) transfer to urban green and information about the policy context of climate change adaptation, our study can also improve understanding of the mechanism of the effects by analyzing the two potential pathways of shifts in perceived consequentiality and credibility. To the best of our knowledge, no previous research has investigated the roles of consequentiality and credibility perceptions for explaining effects of information scripts on stated preferences.…”
Section: Information Effects Consequentiality and Credibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%