1966
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5371(66)80100-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of informational set on acquisition in verbal conditioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1980
1980

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this interpretation the "good" informs the subject of the interviewer's point of view and a simple conformity effect follows. Two studies which provide some support for this interpretation are ones by Farley andHokanson (1966), andKrasner et al (1965). Farley and Hokanson (1966) found that the information value of the reinforcer significantly affected conditioning in a Taffel situation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to this interpretation the "good" informs the subject of the interviewer's point of view and a simple conformity effect follows. Two studies which provide some support for this interpretation are ones by Farley andHokanson (1966), andKrasner et al (1965). Farley and Hokanson (1966) found that the information value of the reinforcer significantly affected conditioning in a Taffel situation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Two studies which provide some support for this interpretation are ones by Farley andHokanson (1966), andKrasner et al (1965). Farley and Hokanson (1966) found that the information value of the reinforcer significantly affected conditioning in a Taffel situation. Subjects in a high-information condition were told that the reinforcer signaled a correct response 90% of the time, and subjects in a low-information condition were told that reinforcement signaled a correct response 50% of the time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%