2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of intercritical heat treatment on the mechanical properties of AISI 3115 steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
26
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that the strength values of the investigated tempered Fe-C specimen are higher than the strength of the as-received specimen, due to the presence of the harder second phase in the tempered Fe-C specimens which is martensite [20]. However, it should be noted that the strength of martensite formed in soft ferrite matrix may be different from the structure formed when steel is transformation from austenite to 100% martensite [21]. …”
Section: Tensile Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This indicates that the strength values of the investigated tempered Fe-C specimen are higher than the strength of the as-received specimen, due to the presence of the harder second phase in the tempered Fe-C specimens which is martensite [20]. However, it should be noted that the strength of martensite formed in soft ferrite matrix may be different from the structure formed when steel is transformation from austenite to 100% martensite [21]. …”
Section: Tensile Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In Zahid et al [6], specimens corresponding to all heat treatment temperatures showed higher hardness as compared to the annealed specimens of the same steel. In general, quenching and tempering results the optimum fatigue properties in heat treated steels although at a hardness level above about Rc 40 bainitic structure produced by austempering results in better fatigue properties than quenched and tempered structure with the same hardness [7]. The poor performance of the quenched and tempered structure indicated by electron micrographs is the result of stress concentration effects of the thin carbide films which are formed during the formation of martensite in tempering and also the fatigue limits increases with decreasing tempering temperature up to a hardness Rc 45 to Rc 55 which is well explained [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…3 The intercritical heat treatment, which involves holding in the two-phase (a+g) region, followed by quick cooling, is frequently applied to obtain ferrite and martensite phases in a low-alloy steel. [4][5][6][7][8] Previous investigations suggested that different chemical compositions, thermomechanical processing routes or heat treatments lead to different microstructural configurations, different phase-space distributions and other microstructure characteristics, affecting the deformation and failure behaviors of DP steels. 9,10 Recently, researchers obtained the flow curves of the composite phases using micromechanical modelling based on the RVEs selected from a real microstructure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%