2019
DOI: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2019.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of interface morphology in waste tyre rubber powder filled elastomeric matrices on the tear and abrasion resistance

Abstract: The interface between either Micronised Rubber Powder (MRP) or Crumb Rubber Powder (CRP) fillers in either Natural Rubber (NR) or Butadiene Rubber (BR) matrices has been studied using Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) 'network visualisation'. The convoluted structure of CRP provides better interfacial adhesion than MRP. The weak interface between the MRP networks and the rubber matrix was confirmed by the lower physical bonding. The crescent tear strength test was able to characterise the possible weak in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
15
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher SIC at the crack tip enhances crack tip blunting and branching [30]. The irregular (convoluted) surface of CRP400 as reported in an earlier study [17] compared to MRP074 compound provides greater surface area and a stronger interface between the particles and the rubber matrix. A stronger interface interaction/bonding was defined as the interaction level between the rubber and filler that could restrict the mobility of the rubber molecules on the filler surfaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Higher SIC at the crack tip enhances crack tip blunting and branching [30]. The irregular (convoluted) surface of CRP400 as reported in an earlier study [17] compared to MRP074 compound provides greater surface area and a stronger interface between the particles and the rubber matrix. A stronger interface interaction/bonding was defined as the interaction level between the rubber and filler that could restrict the mobility of the rubber molecules on the filler surfaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…It depends on several factors like the type of rubber used and its viscoelasticity, filler type, temperature, degree of crosslinking, etc. 14,15 The path to be taken by a particular crack defined for a rubber vulcanizate might proceed to uncharted ways. Generic reinforcing filler systems used in these vulcanizates are carbon black and silica.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GTR can be used as an additive without any physical or chemical treatment in asphalt and can be bound together with polyurethane. GTR can be blended with thermoplastic 4 , 5 or thermoset 6 9 polymers with or without compatibilization 10 , 11 . However, the volume of these applications cannot meet the ever-increasing need for rubber recycling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%