2013
DOI: 10.1002/bdm.1790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Intuitive Advice Justification on Advice Taking

Abstract: How do you respond when receiving advice from somebody with the argumentation "my gut tells me so" or "this is what my intuition says"? Most likely, you would find this justification insufficient and disregard the advice. Are there also situations where people do appreciate such intuitive advice and change their opinion accordingly? A growing number of authors write about the power of intuition in solving problems, showing that intuitively made decisions can be of higher quality than decisions based on analyti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to advice attributes, advisor attributes deserve more attention among family firm researchers. While prior family firm research has focused on advisor attributes such as their formal versus informal status (Naldi et al, 2015) and their professional backgrounds (e.g., Barbera & Hasso, 2013; Strike, 2013), psychology research has revealed additional important advisor attributes, such as expertise, trustworthiness, confidence, similarity (Feng & Feng, 2013), seniority (Tzioti et al, 2014), and motives (van Swol, 2009), which all affect the advice taking. Given that family firm decision makers are typically considered to be reluctant to take advice (Michel & Kammerlander, 2015; Naldi et al, 2015), family firm researchers and practitioners should aim to understand which advisor attributes are preferred by those individuals and why.…”
Section: Discussion Opportunities For Future Research and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to advice attributes, advisor attributes deserve more attention among family firm researchers. While prior family firm research has focused on advisor attributes such as their formal versus informal status (Naldi et al, 2015) and their professional backgrounds (e.g., Barbera & Hasso, 2013; Strike, 2013), psychology research has revealed additional important advisor attributes, such as expertise, trustworthiness, confidence, similarity (Feng & Feng, 2013), seniority (Tzioti et al, 2014), and motives (van Swol, 2009), which all affect the advice taking. Given that family firm decision makers are typically considered to be reluctant to take advice (Michel & Kammerlander, 2015; Naldi et al, 2015), family firm researchers and practitioners should aim to understand which advisor attributes are preferred by those individuals and why.…”
Section: Discussion Opportunities For Future Research and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, studies conducted in the Netherlands found that advice based on intuition is generally doubted, unless it is received from people with seniority, where it is utilised to a greater extent. 41 Additionally, a study on the role of advice in decision making more generally found that people who hold greater knowledge in a particular area are more likely to discount advice, placing greater significance on their personal opinion. 42 While the recruiter-coach relationship was seen as an influence on the approach to recruit selection, it is possible that this relationship is also reciprocal.…”
Section: Recruiter-coach Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tzioti, Van Osselaer, and Wierenga (2010) found that the first option (using intuition-driven arguments, such as "my gut tells me") is effective in the situation of a senior advisor and a weakly structured problem. However, in the case of a junior advisor and more structured problems, System 2-type arguments (such as "the market research data tell me") work better.…”
Section: The Orac Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%