2016
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2015.2478745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of K-Distributed Clutter on Trackability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the false alarm probability is constant, the curve of relationship between the threshold factor T and shape parameter v is also obtainable, as shown in Fig. 4. As for the shape parameter v of clutter, it can be estimated using radar parameters and environmental information, so as to determine the corresponding adaptive threshold factor T .…”
Section: Relationship Between False Alarm Probability and Threshold F...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the false alarm probability is constant, the curve of relationship between the threshold factor T and shape parameter v is also obtainable, as shown in Fig. 4. As for the shape parameter v of clutter, it can be estimated using radar parameters and environmental information, so as to determine the corresponding adaptive threshold factor T .…”
Section: Relationship Between False Alarm Probability and Threshold F...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to address this problem, it is necessary to identify the characteristics of sea clutter distribution in real time. To obtain the parameters of clutter distribution model in real time, there are a series of clutter model estimation methods proposed by scholars, such as maximum likelihood estimation method [3] and moment estimation method [4] . However, they all require the parameters of the clutter distribution model to be estimated using the measurement data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PMHT approach can be extended to combine features such as the intensity distribution of observations [5,30] or the spatial information obtained by arrays of acoustic receivers [31]. This method is also flexible enough to handle fluctuations of the clutter and target distribution within the TD matrix [32] and Reference [33] even offered an indicative metric to determine the conditions in which tracking is feasible. Yet, while TBD approaches often achieve good results, their main disadvantages are the sensitivity to different target's dynamic types (especially those unknown a-priori) and the high algorithmic complexity, which prevents their application in realistic scenarios (where the TD matrix might contain hundreds of thousands of elements).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, H-PMHT fails to track fast-moving targets. An analytic trackability framework which aim to determine the clutter/interfering conditions in which tracking is feasible was developed by Schoenecker et al in [34], [35], [36] for various types of clutter. Extension to the case of two close-by targets is given in [37].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%