2016
DOI: 10.24198/jbm.v17i1.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Leverage, Liquidity, Profitability, Coverage, Growth, and Firm Size With Auditor’s Reputation As A Moderating To Bond Rating of Banking Firm

Abstract: AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh leverage, likuiditas, profitabilitas, coverage, dan ukuran perusahaan dengan reputasi auditor sebagai moderating untuk peringkat obligasi dari perusahaan perbankan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) dan dinilai oleh PT Pefindo periode 2004 AbstractThis research aims to determine the effect of leverage, liquidity, profitability, coverage, and firm size with auditor's reputation as a moderating to bond rating of banking firm which listed in In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
1
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
1
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with the research results of Rosa and Musdholifah (2016), with sample of 176 bond rates by PEFINDO period 2004 to 2013. showed that profitability, growth, and firm size had an effect on bond rating. In the other hand, leverage, liquidity, and coverage had no effect on bond rating.…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 87%
“…In line with the research results of Rosa and Musdholifah (2016), with sample of 176 bond rates by PEFINDO period 2004 to 2013. showed that profitability, growth, and firm size had an effect on bond rating. In the other hand, leverage, liquidity, and coverage had no effect on bond rating.…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 87%
“…When associated with bond ratings, higher leverage ratios result in bond ratings declining. This phenomenon is in line with research Prastiani (2018), Kustiyaningrum et al (2017), Sari and Badira (2016), Rosa and Musdholifah (2016) and, Henny (2016),which stated that leverage did not significantly affect bond ratings. This phenomenon is different from research Wijaya (2019), Ng and Arif (2019), Chabowski et al (2019), Sajjad and Zakaria (2018), Hiqmahtunnisah et al (2018), Winanti et al (2017), Sun and Zhang (2017), Bakhtiari (2017), Partha and Yasa (2016), Khatami et al (2016), and Ayres (2016), which stated that leverage had a significant effect on bond ratings.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, lower-rated publishers have higher market ratios (Livingston et al, 2018). This is in line with research Wijaya (2019), Chabowski et al (2019), Syawal and Fachrizal (2016), Rosa andMusdholifah (2016), andFracassi et al (2016), which states that market value affects bond ratings. Based on theoretical studies and pertinent research, this study's hypotheses are: H3: Market value affects bond ratings.…”
Section: Activity Ratio and Bond Ratingsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Transaksi yang lebih kompleks tersebut mengharuskan perusahaan melaporkan informasi laporan keuangan yang lebih banyak dibandingan dengan perusahaan yang berukuran kecil. Ukuran perusaaan memungkinkan investor dapat mengetahui kemampuan perusahaan untuk membayar bunga obligasi secara berkala dan membayar pokok yang dapat meningkatkan peringkat obligasi (Rosa & Musdholifah, 2016).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified