2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41428-019-0169-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of macrodipole orientation on the piezoelectric response of cyclic β-peptide nanotube bundles on gold substrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Supramolecular nanostructures, which consist of selfassembling peptide derivatives, have attracted rapidly increasing attention for the fabrication of various biofunctional materials [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Recent seminal works have revealed that short peptides bearing an aromatic group at their N-termini have a robust potential to self-assemble into supramolecular nanostructures under aqueous conditions with subsequent hydrogel formation, facilitating active exploration [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supramolecular nanostructures, which consist of selfassembling peptide derivatives, have attracted rapidly increasing attention for the fabrication of various biofunctional materials [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Recent seminal works have revealed that short peptides bearing an aromatic group at their N-termini have a robust potential to self-assemble into supramolecular nanostructures under aqueous conditions with subsequent hydrogel formation, facilitating active exploration [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CP3Npi molecules should stack in a columnar arrangement to adopt one mode of nearly parallel stacking of Npi moieties out of three possible modes due to the constraint of stacking of cyclic tri-b-peptides. 28,29 CD spectra also support a regular arrangement of Npi moieties in nanotubes. CP3Npi in HFIP solution shows no Cotton effect around 450 nm in the Npi absorption region, except a negative Cotton effect at 210 nm which is attributed cyclic peptide skeleton (Fig.…”
Section: Chromophore Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…There are three stacking modes with rotations by 0 , 120 , and 240 between rst and second cyclic peptides along PNT. 29 The rotation by 0 of the closest Npi moieties (blue spheres) illustrated in Fig. 4D causes severe electrostatic repulsions whilst other rotations (red spheres illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Ph-response Of Chromophoresmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although these values were lower than those of the α-helical 24mer peptide SAM (16 μCm −2 K −1 ) [35] and poly(vinylidene fluoride) (27 μCm −2 K −1 ), [36] they are over 10 times larger than that in a previous report of naphthyl group-containing PNTs (0.27 μCm −2 K −1 ). [22] The large pyroelectric coefficients are therefore ascribable to the polarized charge-transfer complexes. in the ES-type PNT, resulting in resistance against structural distortion in the AA-type PNT more than in the ES-type PNT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two kinds of cyclic peptide skeletons were designed and synthesized, cyclo(β-Asp-β-Ala-β-Ala) or cyclo (β-Lys-β-Ala-β-Ala) (AA-type cyclic peptide, Figure 1B, left) and cyclo(β-Asp-ethylenediamine-succinic acid) or cyclo(β-Lys-ethylenediamine-succinic acid) (ES-type cyclic peptide, Figure 1B, right). [22,23] According to the previous report, the chloranil and TTF groups introduced at the side chains are arranged randomly for a AAtype PNT, and they are arranged in a left-handed helical manner for a ES-type PNT owing to the maximizing the number of intermolecular hydrogen bonds through the PNTs. [23] Combinations of donor/acceptor cyclic peptides, CP3TAA/CP3CAA and CP3TES/CP3CES, were self-assembled into PNTs to form a charge-transfer complex along the PNT ( Figure 1C) and the electronic properties on a gold substrate and piezo-response properties were studied by the current sensing atomic force microscopy (AFM), the Kelvin force microscopy (KFM), and the piezoelectric force microscopy (PFM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%