2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2906533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Mandated CSR Disclosure on the Pollution Levels of Publicly-Traded Chinese Firms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An increasing number of recent studies pay attention to the real economic impact of voluntary CSR disclosure. The previous literature indicates that voluntary CSR disclosure has the merits of reducing information asymmetry and cost of capital (Dhaliwal et al ., , , ), while mandatory CSR disclosure has implications for mine‐safety records, environmental impacts, and CSR expenditure (Christensen et al ., ; Gramlich and Huang, ; Fiechter et al ., ). Our paper is closely related with two recent studies focusing on the economic impacts of the mandatory CSR disclosure regulation in China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increasing number of recent studies pay attention to the real economic impact of voluntary CSR disclosure. The previous literature indicates that voluntary CSR disclosure has the merits of reducing information asymmetry and cost of capital (Dhaliwal et al ., , , ), while mandatory CSR disclosure has implications for mine‐safety records, environmental impacts, and CSR expenditure (Christensen et al ., ; Gramlich and Huang, ; Fiechter et al ., ). Our paper is closely related with two recent studies focusing on the economic impacts of the mandatory CSR disclosure regulation in China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, their use of macro-level outcomes (i. e., emissions measured at the city level rather than at the firm level) allows Chen et al (2018) to estimate the total effect of the regulation, including spillover effects (i. e., changes in pollution that might result from peer firms in the same city which are themselves not subject to the regulation). Gramlich and Huang (2017) complements these results by providing evidence on the type of firms and activities that give rise to the overall reduction in pollution levels. Using a firm-level outcome (the Trucost environmental impact ratio), the study finds that pollution levels of treated firms go down due to both direct and indirect (i. e., supplychain-related) effects.…”
Section: Environmental Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Several studies find a significant reduction in carbon emissions after CSR reporting regulations. For example, Gramlich and Huang (2017) find a decrease in pollution levels of affected firms relative to control firms after the CSR reporting regulation in China. Also, in China, Chen et al (2018) show that cities most affected by the CSR reporting regulation (i.e.…”
Section: Carbon Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%