1974
DOI: 10.1093/bja/46.10.729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Methohexitone on Myocardial Blood Flow and Oxygen Consumption in the Dog

Abstract: Methohexitone in doses of 2 mg/kg and 4 mg/kg was administered via a right atrial catheter to mechanically ventilated dogs lightly anaesthetized with trichloroethylene. The drug caused a significant initial increase in heart rate and a decrease in mean arterial pressure with both doses and a decrease in cardiac output. There was a significant reduction in myocardial blood flow, and myocardial oxygen availability and consumption following both doses. Neither dose caused any change in myocardial oxygen extractio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1995
1995
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our experimental data (in the cat) indicate that the increase in HR is a direct effect of the drug and not related to baroreflex mechanisms (23). The effects of methohexital on the heart and systemic vascular resistance seem to vary according to dose but above all depending on the populations of patients studied (22,(24)(25)(26)(27). Very high infusion rates (24 mg * kg-'h-I) in neurosurgical patients were associated with a 24% reduction in SVR and no change in CO (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Our experimental data (in the cat) indicate that the increase in HR is a direct effect of the drug and not related to baroreflex mechanisms (23). The effects of methohexital on the heart and systemic vascular resistance seem to vary according to dose but above all depending on the populations of patients studied (22,(24)(25)(26)(27). Very high infusion rates (24 mg * kg-'h-I) in neurosurgical patients were associated with a 24% reduction in SVR and no change in CO (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%