“…Understanding the complexities of the underlying physics responsible for the day‐to‐day variability of EPBs remains a challenge. Various observation and modeling efforts have been conducted to investigate the underlying physics responsible for the day‐to‐day variability of EPBs, such as seed perturbations (Abdu et al., 2009; Krall et al., 2013; Retterer & Roddy, 2014; Singh et al., 1997), neutral winds (Huba & Krall, 2013; Huba et al., 2009; Krall et al., 2009, 2021; Maruyama & Matuura, 1984), vertical drifts (Retterer et al., 2005; Su et al., 2009), shear instability (Hysell & Kudeki, 2004; Yokoyama et al., 2015), Es‐layer instability (Huba et al., 2020; Tsunoda, 2007), tidal forcing (Chang et al., 2021; Chou, Wu, et al., 2020; Tsunoda et al., 2015), upwelling growth (e.g., Tsunoda, 2015), and penetration electric fields due to geomagnetic storms (e.g., Cherniak & Zakharenkova, 2016; Rajesh et al., 2017). These studies primarily focus on a single driver that controls EPB development, and artificial seed perturbations are required in the initial conditions for EPB simulations (e.g., Yokoyama, 2017).…”