2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of modifying foot progression angle on the knee loading parameters in healthy participants with different static foot postures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As changes in COP position are closely related to muscle activity 14) , the alteration of FPA could result in unfavorable biomechanical changes in the ankle joint but did not preclude the practice of gait modification to alteration of FPA, given the results. Furthermore, we predicted that the difference in arch height would have different effects on both COP 15) and KAM 16) , but no significant differences were observed between the three FPA conditions among the participants of this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…As changes in COP position are closely related to muscle activity 14) , the alteration of FPA could result in unfavorable biomechanical changes in the ankle joint but did not preclude the practice of gait modification to alteration of FPA, given the results. Furthermore, we predicted that the difference in arch height would have different effects on both COP 15) and KAM 16) , but no significant differences were observed between the three FPA conditions among the participants of this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The CIRRIS database was recorded on two participants during normal walking (N) and while subjects were simulating 3 different gait strategies related to knee osteoarthritis [ 37 , 38 , 39 ]: right toe with an external angle (TA), flat strike of the right foot (rFF) and right trunk leaning (rTL). For each randomized condition, both participants walked for 2 min at 5 different speeds (0.8, 1, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6 m/s).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FPA gait modification has been suggested to modify foot pressure in children with neuromuscular diseases [6], and FPA modifications and physical therapy may be required for children with abnormal toe-in or toe-out angles [7]. FPA has further been linked to cerebral palsy, Perthes disease, gastrocnemius inflexibility, and distal tibial physeal fractures [8]- [11], and FPA gait modification can lead to changes in foot pressure loading [12], [13], ankle eversion moment [14], knee adduction moment [14]- [16], and hip joint moments [17]. While the vast majority of FPA gait modification studies require tethered, laboratorybased equipment and utilize either visual biofeedback or verbal gait modification cues [18], [19], wearable haptic biofeedback could enable FPA gait modification for more widespread use in clinics and natural environments [20]- [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%