2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of motor context on semantic processing: A TMS study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We hypothesized a reduction in the MEP signal, for both Italian and German sentences, driven by the negative markers that occurred at different sentence-specific timings (depending on the position of the adverb in each language) but at a common and word-specific timing (i.e., 250 ms after adverb presentation). This would be in line with evidence supporting that (I) semantic processing is automatically initiated immediately after the presentation of a lexical input (see also Hauk, Shtyrov, & Pulvermüller, 2008;Hinojosa, Martín-Loeches, Muñoz, Casado, & Pozo, 2004) and that (II) motor-related processes of discrimination between various semantic types (e.g., meaningful vs. meaningless, as well as motor vs. abstract lexical items) take place around 250 ms after stimulus onset (De Marco et al, 2018;Kellenbach et al, 2002;Pulvermüller et al, 2001;Scorolli et al, 2012). Moreover, we hypothesized that MEPs related to the processing of concrete sentences should be higher than those related to abstract sentences (see also Innocenti, De Stefani, Sestito, & Gentilucci, 2014;Scorolli et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…We hypothesized a reduction in the MEP signal, for both Italian and German sentences, driven by the negative markers that occurred at different sentence-specific timings (depending on the position of the adverb in each language) but at a common and word-specific timing (i.e., 250 ms after adverb presentation). This would be in line with evidence supporting that (I) semantic processing is automatically initiated immediately after the presentation of a lexical input (see also Hauk, Shtyrov, & Pulvermüller, 2008;Hinojosa, Martín-Loeches, Muñoz, Casado, & Pozo, 2004) and that (II) motor-related processes of discrimination between various semantic types (e.g., meaningful vs. meaningless, as well as motor vs. abstract lexical items) take place around 250 ms after stimulus onset (De Marco et al, 2018;Kellenbach et al, 2002;Pulvermüller et al, 2001;Scorolli et al, 2012). Moreover, we hypothesized that MEPs related to the processing of concrete sentences should be higher than those related to abstract sentences (see also Innocenti, De Stefani, Sestito, & Gentilucci, 2014;Scorolli et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Thus, memorizing abstract words by performing gestures might change their cognitive representations and make them more similar to concrete words. Interestingly, in a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study, De Marco and colleagues 90 investigated the excitability of the motor cortex during abstract word comprehension. They expected a modulation of motor cortex excitability if a word had previously been connected to a semantically-related gesture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent TMS study, De Marco et al (2018) tested the effect of context in modulating motor cortex excitability during abstract words semantic processing. The presentation of a congruent manual symbolic gesture as prime stimulus increased hand M1 excitability in the earlier phase of semantic processing and speeded word comprehension.…”
Section: What Is Embodied About Communication? the Involvement Of Mirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large amount of researches have claimed that, during language production and comprehension, gesture and spoken language are tightly connected (Gunter and Bach, 2004; Bernardis and Gentilucci, 2006; Gentilucci et al, 2006; Gentilucci and Dalla Volta, 2008; Campione et al, 2014; De Marco et al, 2015, 2018), suggesting that the neural systems for language understanding and action production are closely interactive (Andric et al, 2013).…”
Section: Gestures: a Bridge Between Language And Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation