2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/6729754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Network Structure on Compressive Fatigue Behavior of Unfilled Styrene‐Butadiene Rubber

Abstract: e effect of network structure on dynamic compressive fatigue behavior and static compressive mechanical properties of styrenebutadiene rubber (SBR) were investigated. A series of SBR compounds with different amounts of sulfur and dicumyl peroxide (DCP) were prepared, and their crosslinking densities were calculated using the Flory-Rehner equation. Compressive fatigue resistance and creep behavior of the vulcanizates were performed on a mechanical testing and simulation (MTS) machine. e fatigue damage surface o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nature of crosslinks formed during vulcanization is known to influence fatigue properties as well [25]. The sulfur vulcanization system used in NBR may aid [26,27]. The ability of the polysulfide crosslinks to cleave quickly and reform enables enhanced energy dissipation, thus offering a better fatigue life in rubber vulcanizates [28].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of crosslinks formed during vulcanization is known to influence fatigue properties as well [25]. The sulfur vulcanization system used in NBR may aid [26,27]. The ability of the polysulfide crosslinks to cleave quickly and reform enables enhanced energy dissipation, thus offering a better fatigue life in rubber vulcanizates [28].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 4 a,d, the top surface of both samples before the compression fatigue tests were smooth and flat. According to our previous work [ 23 ], for unfilled SBR, there are many cavities and serious damage on the surface. However, for the filled SBR, no obvious cavities were present on the surface, whereas different damages and cracks appeared on the top surface, as shown in Figure 4 b,c.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%