1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0300-5712(98)00040-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of parabens in a mouthwash and incorporated into a sustained release varnish on salivary bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
6

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…[39] Both the preservatives were used at a much lower concentration than what was found to inhibit oral bacteria. [40414243] Literature suggests that both neem and mango stick extracts have slightly acidic pH, but the pH is lesser than the tooth critical pH. [1317] The preservative methyl paraben is effective in a wide range of pH (4-8), while sodium benzoate is most effective at pH 4-4.5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[39] Both the preservatives were used at a much lower concentration than what was found to inhibit oral bacteria. [40414243] Literature suggests that both neem and mango stick extracts have slightly acidic pH, but the pH is lesser than the tooth critical pH. [1317] The preservative methyl paraben is effective in a wide range of pH (4-8), while sodium benzoate is most effective at pH 4-4.5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides being vehicles for the delivery of active compounds in the treatment of specific problems, mouthrinses have been used in the chemical control of dental plaque biofilm to complement mechanical procedures (1,4,10,16,24,26). In general, their basic composition is not complex -a vehicle (water, alcohol or glycerin), flavoring agents, surfactant agents and colorants; the differential characteristic of these products is the incorporation of antimicrobial substances, associated or not with fluoride compounds (1,4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parabens have been demonstrated as a good preservation agent in different dosage forms (Młynarczyk et al, 2008;Doron et al, 2001;Steinberg et al, 1999;Zani et al, 1997). For methylparaben the MIC has been reported in the range of 0.05-0.2% (w/v) (Sandler, 2009;Scott and Gorman, 1992;Aalto et al, 1953); assuming it to be 0.1% (w/v) the concentrations of free methylparaben were calculated in a 5% (w/v) HPβCD solution as described in the theoretical section, see Fig.…”
Section: Prediction Of the Antimicrobial Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%