2018
DOI: 10.1002/lsm.22929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of photodynamic therapy on pathogenic bacteria around peri‐implant sulcus and in the cavity between abutment and implant after healing phase: A prospective clinical study

Abstract: PDT appears to be effective in bacterial reduction compared to ethanol and can reduce P. gingivalis with short time intervals, as well as decreasing total bacteria counts within abutment screw cavities in the long run, suggesting PDT an effective way sterilizing inner surface of oral implant suprastrutures. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:433-439, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, different bacteria could have different sensitivity to the therapy. A study showed that PDT reduced the population of P. gingivalis , but it did not observe the other bacteria . This could be explored in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, different bacteria could have different sensitivity to the therapy. A study showed that PDT reduced the population of P. gingivalis , but it did not observe the other bacteria . This could be explored in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common way to detect bacteria is polymerase chain reaction (PCR); sometimes, RNA probes are also used. These studies found that the treatment group with additional PDT significantly reduced the expression levels of P. gingivalis , F. nucleatum , 80,105 A. actinomycetemcomitans , T. forsythia , 100 T. denticola , 76 P. intermedia , 106 Eubacterium nodatum , and Eikenella corrodens compared with the group that only performed SRP 80,87,107,108 . Some reports also show that PDT failed to demonstrate additional bacteriological benefits of P. gingivalis , A. actinomycetemcomitans , T. forsythia , and T. denticola in periodontitis patients 74,109,110 (Table 2).…”
Section: Clinical Effect Of Pdt In the Treatment Of Periodontitismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There are three PSs approved to be used in the clinical practice of periodontal treatment, MB, TBO, and ICG, of which MB is the most commonly used. [76][77][78][79][80][81] The concentrations of PSs in clinical trials ranged from 1 to 10 mg/mL; the incubation time of PS in the periodontal pocket varied from 1 to 3 min; the wavelengths of the light used were mainly 635 and 670 nm, and also 810 80 and 940 nm 82 have been used; the diameter of fibers varied from 200 to 750 μm, while the time exposure to the light was generally 60 s, also for 30 s, 80 and 150 s 83 in some studies. The energy dose of light varies from 3 to 320 J/cm 2 .…”
Section: Pss and Light Source Of Pdt In Periodontal Adjuvant Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various combinations of photosensitizers, light sources and protocols have Early researchers suggested that the basic procedure could be modified for the photoeradication of localized infections, antimicrobial PDT (aPDT; also known as antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation, aPDI, and photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy, PACT) [75][76][77]. Various combinations of photosensitizers, light sources and protocols have since been studied in dentistry as an antimicrobial treatment for periodontitis [78][79][80][81][82], periimplantitis [83][84][85][86], and root canal disinfection [87][88][89]. There is yet to evolve a standard protocol [90].…”
Section: Mechanism Of Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%