2015
DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.4524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Physician Continuing Medical Education on Patient-Reported Outcomes for Identifying and Optimally Managing Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Abstract: Study Objective: To evaluate the effect of continuing medical education (CME) activities on patient reported outcomes with regard to (1) screening for excessive sleepiness (ES) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and (2) appropriate referral and treatment. Methods: A total of 725 patients were recruited from 75 providers who either participated or did not participate in Transtheoretical Model (TTM)-based OSA CME activities. Patient reported outcomes from participating (n = 36) and non-participating providers (n … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…47 We also note that although it was not possible to link definitively the changes in behavior we observed in the trial to specific practical behaviors in clinical practice, such changes are likely given the link between CME and clinical care in a variety of settings. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] Similarly, there would be clear benefit in showing that CME leads to improved patient outcomes, but this would require 2 things that are challenging to obtain. First is the time needed to measure the cumulative impact of education on medical skills, which one can predict would take years to manifest (not a realistic goal for a 6-month intervention).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…47 We also note that although it was not possible to link definitively the changes in behavior we observed in the trial to specific practical behaviors in clinical practice, such changes are likely given the link between CME and clinical care in a variety of settings. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] Similarly, there would be clear benefit in showing that CME leads to improved patient outcomes, but this would require 2 things that are challenging to obtain. First is the time needed to measure the cumulative impact of education on medical skills, which one can predict would take years to manifest (not a realistic goal for a 6-month intervention).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is every reason to feel confident that clinical skills improved, given studies showing that HIV patients who are managed by clinicians with greater knowledge and expertise receive more appropriate care. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] Decisions on expansion and scale-up of novel interventions must be guided not just on benefit but also on cost. Yet, the published literature on economic evaluations of mHealth interventions generally is sparse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of papers like this one stress the need for more education of general and clinical physicians. In this way they will recognize the disease early enough to diagnose OSA and to provide proper treatment to OSA patients [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CME is most effective when it is interactive, involves multiple exposures, and focuses on topics that clinicians view as important and timely [4]. When properly delivered, CME offers numerous benefits, including enhancing clinician knowledge, skills, and attitudes, improving patient outcomes, and lowering health care costs [5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%