2016
DOI: 10.3386/w22328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Pollution on Worker Productivity: Evidence from Call-Center Workers in China

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
2
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
53
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These papers significantly advance our understanding of how pollution affects productivity and convincingly demonstrate that air pollution causes labor productivity to decrease. However, because these studies rely on the exogeneity of air pollution as an identification strategy, they focus on narrow groups of workers in particular occupations such as fruit picking (Graff Zivin and Neidell, 2012), pear packing (Chang et al, 2016a), call center services (Chang et al, 2016b), garment assembly (Adhvaryu et al, 2014a) or a few firms in textile assembly (He, Liu et al, 2016). Air pollution has also been found to negatively impact short-run productivity of outdoor sports personnel including soccer players (Lichter et al, 2015), marathon runners (Fu and Guo, 2016), and baseball umpires (Archsmith et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These papers significantly advance our understanding of how pollution affects productivity and convincingly demonstrate that air pollution causes labor productivity to decrease. However, because these studies rely on the exogeneity of air pollution as an identification strategy, they focus on narrow groups of workers in particular occupations such as fruit picking (Graff Zivin and Neidell, 2012), pear packing (Chang et al, 2016a), call center services (Chang et al, 2016b), garment assembly (Adhvaryu et al, 2014a) or a few firms in textile assembly (He, Liu et al, 2016). Air pollution has also been found to negatively impact short-run productivity of outdoor sports personnel including soccer players (Lichter et al, 2015), marathon runners (Fu and Guo, 2016), and baseball umpires (Archsmith et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with the previous study, the authors also found that PM 2.5 does not affect labor supply. PM 2.5 also had effects on productivity at levels below air quality standards, with effects arising at 20-25 μg/m 3 . In terms of the magnitude of the effect, based on approximate calculations, the authors estimate that the worker productivity effects represent roughly 25% of the total benefits (as measured by changes in housing values) from improvements in air quality.…”
Section: Manufacturing Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent work, researchers explore the effect of PM 2.5 on the output of call center workers, which represents an important part of the service sector, in two cities in China [3]. In this setting, worker output is routinely monitored, as the workers receive partly performance-based pay depending on the number of phone calls completed, thus providing precise measures of each worker's daily output.…”
Section: Service Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We observe students' nationalities, both foreign and Chinese, and the time since first enrolling at the school which, for children of expatriate families, may be a reasonable proxy for their time of residence in China. We are thus able to look for heterogeneous responses of absences to short-run variation in PM2.5 across nationality, 1 Exceptions are studies examining worker or household-level panels in China and Peru (Chang et al, 2016a;He et al, 2017;Aragon et al, 2016). Given their developing country setting, these three studies focus on particulate matter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%