2016
DOI: 10.1111/add.13257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of potential electronic nicotine delivery system regulations on nicotine product selection

Abstract: Aims To estimate the effect of potential regulations of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) among adult smokers, including increasing taxes, reducing flavour availability, and adding warning labels communicating various levels of risk. Design We performed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) among a national sample of 1,200 adult smokers. We examined heterogeneity in policy responses by age, cigarette quitting interest, and current ENDS use. Our experiment overlapped January, 2015 by design, providing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
58
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
8
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with a recent focus group study showing that participants considered MarkTen warnings to be stronger that a nicotine statement 49. It also corroborates recent evidence that young adult smokers, compared with older adult smokers, are less likely to choose ENDS when exposed to strong health warning messages 47. The combined evidence suggests that the warning message required by the FDA may deter youth uptake of ENDS, but stronger warnings could have a greater impact.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This finding is consistent with a recent focus group study showing that participants considered MarkTen warnings to be stronger that a nicotine statement 49. It also corroborates recent evidence that young adult smokers, compared with older adult smokers, are less likely to choose ENDS when exposed to strong health warning messages 47. The combined evidence suggests that the warning message required by the FDA may deter youth uptake of ENDS, but stronger warnings could have a greater impact.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…17 Further, the presence of a modified risk warning label was not associated with differences in choice of e-cigarettes over other tobacco products. 17 In a study using another behavioral economic measure of demand, willingness to pay, smokers valued the availability of flavors and the harm reduction potential of e-cigarettes, and would pay significantly less for an e-cigarette without these attributes. 21 Collectively, these examinations and the present studies demonstrate that both flavors and modified risk messaging can affect smokers’ abuse liability for e-cigarettes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…16 Young adult cigarette smokers respond more to e-cigarette flavor availability than do older smokers, suggesting a role for flavors in attracting youth. 17 However, otherwise, there is a dearth of experimental research addressing how e-cigarette flavor affects e-cigarette use or abuse liability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we are to believe that e-cigarettes and combustible cigarettes are substitute products, any price advantage given to combustible cigarettes is likely to increase smoking relative to what would be the case if e-cigarettes had the price advantage 26. If e-cigarettes are complementary products to combustible cigarettes, then we would expect that raising the price of the less expensive product (combustible cigarettes) would still decrease consumption of both products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%