Nerve impulse activity produces both developmental and adult plastic changes in neural networks. For development, however, its precise role and the mechanisms involved remain elusive. Using the classic model of synapse competition and elimination at newly formed neuromuscular junctions, we asked whether spike timing is the instructive signal at inputs competing for synaptic space. Using a rat strain whose soleus muscle is innervated by two nerves, we chronically evoked different temporal spike patterns in the two nerves during synapse formation in the adult. We found that asynchronous activity imposed upon the two nerves promotes synapse elimination, provided that their relative spikes are separated by 25 ms or more; remarkably, this elimination occurs even though an equal number of spikes were evoked in the competing axons. On the other hand, when spikes are separated by 20 ms or less, activity is perceived as synchronous, and elimination is prevented. Thus, in development, as in adult plasticity, precise spike timing plays an instructive role in synaptic modification.I n the adult brain, plastic changes in the strength of synaptic connections between excitable cells occur as a result of experience and contribute to shaping its architecture during development. Many of these changes are known to be tightly linked to the pattern of action potential firing. Temporal spike correlation in pre-and postsynaptic cells strengthens or weakens synapses during development (1-3) and in cellular models of learning (long-term potentiation and depression) (4, 5). Two well known paradigms for these phenomena are Hebb's postulate (6) and spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) (7-10). A classic model to investigate synaptic modification is the elimination of input that occurs at developing neuromuscular junctions (NMJs) as a result of competition among the motor nerve terminals (11)(12)(13)(14). Elimination of input is widespread in the developing peripheral nervous system and CNS; at the NMJ, where it was identified (13), it spans the first 2 wk of postnatal life in rodents, during which time the innervation of each muscle fiber changes from innervation by the collaterals of different motor neurons (polyneuronal innervation) to innervation by only one collateral (mononeuronal innervation). Examples of this peculiar end result also are observed in the CNS (e.g., the innervation of Purkinje cells by climbing fibers) (15). Activity influences this process, but its precise role remains controversial. Briefly, some studies emphasize the overall neuromuscular activity, others emphasize the differences in the amount of activity in competing inputs, and still other studies emphasize activity-independent factors (16-27). (We explore this controversy in more detail in the Discussion.)Differences in activity generally have been tested by comparing active inputs with inputs completely inactivated by conduction block. However, the insight gained from these experiments is limited because all competing motor terminals are active during norma...