1969
DOI: 10.3181/00379727-130-33495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Prostaglandin F2  on the Progestogen Content of Ovaries from Pseudopregnant Rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence was subsequently provided in rats that treatment with PGF2α produced luteolysis (Gutknecht et al, 1969;Pharriss and Wyngarde 1969). Thereafter, a series of experiments by McCracken using auto-transplanted ovaries demonstrated the luteolytic effect of PGF in sheep (Goding et al, 1967;McCracken, 1971).…”
Section: Period Ii: Normal Luteolysis: Role Of Uterus and Pgf -Days 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence was subsequently provided in rats that treatment with PGF2α produced luteolysis (Gutknecht et al, 1969;Pharriss and Wyngarde 1969). Thereafter, a series of experiments by McCracken using auto-transplanted ovaries demonstrated the luteolytic effect of PGF in sheep (Goding et al, 1967;McCracken, 1971).…”
Section: Period Ii: Normal Luteolysis: Role Of Uterus and Pgf -Days 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The luteolytic action of prostaglandin (PG) F-2a in the rat was first demonstrated by Pharriss & Wyngarden (1969), who reported the increase in 20a-dihydroprogesterone concentrations that follow PG treatment. Subsequently, several hypotheses were proposed for the mechanism of action of PGF-2a (reviewed .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pharriss and Wyngarden first postulated that prostaglandin F, was responsible for this phenomenon [3] and subsequent experiments have shown that this prostaglandin is luteolytic in several animals [2]. Conclusive evidence was recently presented that prostaglandin F,, is a luteolytic hormone in the sheep [4]; it was released in relatively high concentrations from the uterus a t the time of luteal regression and was transferred from the utero-ovarian vein to the ovarian artery by a counter-current mechanism [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%