The brain has an endogenous descending control system to modulate pain. This system is thought to arise from the activation of output neurons in the periaqueductal gray area (PAG) that project to the rostroventral medulla, with a relay to the spinal cord to modulate incoming pain signals (Basbaum and Fields, 1984). Electrical stimulation or microinjection of opioids into the ventral portion of the PAG results in analgesia. Opioids activate the pathway by inhibiting tonic GABA release (or disinhibition). The disinhibition hypothesis predicts that morphine and glutamate stimulate the descending pathway via activation of different cell populations, opioids by inhibiting GABA interneurons or inhibitory projection neurons into the PAG, and glutamate by directly activating PAG output neurons. In this issue of Neuropsychopharmacology, RodriguezMunoz et al provide evidence for a close association of NMDA and mu-opioid (MOR) receptors in the PAG, suggesting that these two receptors are not only colocalized within the same cell population, but that there is bidirectional regulation of the NMDA/MOR interaction during acute morphine tolerance.One of the key findings of the Rodriguez-Munoz et al's paper is that MOR proteins and NR1 subunits of the NMDA receptor can be immunoprecipitated by antibodies specific for extracellular epitopes on either the MOR or NR1. These results suggest that the two proteins are directly interacting or interact as part of a signaling complex of multiple proteins. Immunoprecipitation studies are supported with surface plasmon resonance and bimolecular fluorescence complementation analyses, demonstrating that the C-terminal tails of the two proteins can directly bind to one another. The studies by Rodriguez-Munoz and colleagues are the first to suggest that protein complexes containing MOR and NR1 subunits may be functionally regulated during morphine tolerance. Colocalization of MOR and NR1 subunits has been previously observed with electron microscopic analyses in dendrites of PAG neurons, but the subcellular compartmentalization within the dendrites was very different for the two proteins (Commons et al, 1999). However, the antibodies used in the electron microscopic studies were directed at intracellular C-terminal epitopes, so it is possible that MOR/NR1 complexes were not identified. Rodriguez-Munoz et al are appropriately conservative in interpretation of their data by stating that the data support the possibility of a direct physical interaction between MOR and NR1 proteins, but are also consistent with interaction as part of a complex with other binding partners, such as PSD-95. One particularly puzzling result is the fact that the MOR/NR1 complex did not immunoprecipitate with significant numbers of NR2 or NR3 subunits, which may suggest that the MOR binds preferentially to NR1 subunits to limit or control the formation of functional NMDA receptors.A second key finding in the paper by Rodriguez-Munoz et al is that the MOR/NR1 complex may be necessary for morphine-induced antinociception....