2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of pulse charging on commercial lithium nickel cobalt oxide (NMC) cathode lithium-ion batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing these results with [15] we can see that the CCCV charging needed 97 min and the pulsed-CV at 50% duty cycle achieved 82 min for both 50 Hz and 1 Khz, the pulsed charging is 15 min faster than CCCV. What is interesting is that battery capacity did not degrade much with the pulsed charging compared to CCCV profile, which makes the pulsed charging more suitable than CCCV for battery fast charge.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparing these results with [15] we can see that the CCCV charging needed 97 min and the pulsed-CV at 50% duty cycle achieved 82 min for both 50 Hz and 1 Khz, the pulsed charging is 15 min faster than CCCV. What is interesting is that battery capacity did not degrade much with the pulsed charging compared to CCCV profile, which makes the pulsed charging more suitable than CCCV for battery fast charge.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Another known charging method is the pulse charging like discussed in [14] where using a 50% duty cycle at 1 Hz, the cycle life was improved by 4 times and charging time reduced by 17% compared to the CCCV charging protocol. Kannan and Weatherspoon [15] used a Li-ion cell with Nickel Manganese Cobalt Cathode with a slightly different method, pulsed-CV, and charged the cell at frequencies of 50 Hz, 100 Hz and 1 kHz. The reduced charging time is between 14 min and 23 min, and the charging time using pulsed-CV has not changed a lot over the 250 cycles, whereas for the constant current constant voltage method, the charging time increased suddenly after 125 cycles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lithium Cobalt Oxide-LCO batteries have high specific energy but shorter life, lower thermal stability, and defined load abilities. Modern designs include nickel, manganese, and/or aluminium to improve longevity and cost [44].…”
Section: Lithium-ion Battery Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advanced charging protocols, e.g., pulse current (PC) charging, hold the potential to prolong the service life of current LIBs. [6,7] Specifically, PC charging with relaxation has been extensively employed in electrochemical testing of NMC/Graphite, [8][9][10] LiFePO 4 (LFP)/Carbon-based, [11,12] LiCoO 2 (LCO)/Graphite, [13] and LFP/Li [14] batteries from lab cells to commercial batteries. A typical PC charging protocol consists of a constant current (CC) charging step followed by a relaxation period., and the durations of the charging and following relaxation periods vary depending on the experimental design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%