2000
DOI: 10.1177/107755800773743646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Race on the Referral Process for Invasive Cardiac Procedures

Abstract: Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of death in the United States. Blacks are more likely than whites to experience premature disease, and they have poorer prognosis after acute myocardial infarction. Multiple studies have demonstrated that blacks are less likely to be referred for certain invasive cardiac procedures. Few studies have examined the effect of race on physician and patient decision making in referrals for cardiac procedures. The authors present a framework for the complex series of steps… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…44 -46 Similarly, it could be the case that overall revascularization rates in hospitals with a large fraction of black patients could be lower, as suggested by previous research documenting racial gaps in surgical treatment of cardiovascular disease. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]43 These explanations alone cannot explain the gradient, because the regression analysis adjusted for such factors. A plausible explanation is that differences in hospitallevel quality not adequately adjusted for in the present analysis but highlighted in recent studies, such as time to reperfusion, the prescription of ␤-blockers, postsurgical mortality, or the quality of physicians, could explain observed differences in outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…44 -46 Similarly, it could be the case that overall revascularization rates in hospitals with a large fraction of black patients could be lower, as suggested by previous research documenting racial gaps in surgical treatment of cardiovascular disease. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]43 These explanations alone cannot explain the gradient, because the regression analysis adjusted for such factors. A plausible explanation is that differences in hospitallevel quality not adequately adjusted for in the present analysis but highlighted in recent studies, such as time to reperfusion, the prescription of ␤-blockers, postsurgical mortality, or the quality of physicians, could explain observed differences in outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]43 To capture these effects, hospital-specific rates of CABG and percutaneous coronary interventions in the sample were included in 1 specification of the regression. Third, hospitals may differ with respect to average volume of treatment.…”
Section: Potential Explanations For Differences In Risk-adjusted Mortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Health care is based largely on a series of cascading decisions made by patients and their providers (43). These decisions reflect different cognitive processes (81).…”
Section: Principle 4 Constraints On Clinician and Patient Decision Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Communication barriers, problems in the doctor-patient relationship, and bias have been proposed as more important explanations of the differences measured. 5,6 It remains to be seen to what extent patient preference itself is based on a lack of trust in a health care system that has historically treated African Americans unfairly.…”
Section: Photo: Alexander Greenmentioning
confidence: 99%