1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf00343222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of repeated abdominocentesis on peritoneal fluid constituents in the horse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
12
0
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Serial sampling of peritoneal fluid did not result in any adverse effects during this experimental period, corroborating previous findings (Juzwiak et al 1991, Mendes et al 1999, and therefore can be considered a safe technique. However, abdominocentesis should be performed with care since complications, although uncommon, have been reported and can be serious (Tulleners 1983).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Serial sampling of peritoneal fluid did not result in any adverse effects during this experimental period, corroborating previous findings (Juzwiak et al 1991, Mendes et al 1999, and therefore can be considered a safe technique. However, abdominocentesis should be performed with care since complications, although uncommon, have been reported and can be serious (Tulleners 1983).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In horses and calves, it has been established that neither enterocentesis nor serial collection of peritoneal fluid has any significant effect on results of peritoneal fluid analysis [10,5] . Similarly, in this study, there was no effect of repeated abdominocentesis on peritoneal fluid analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inflammation of the peritoneal membrane results in the effusion of large amounts of fluid containing various inflammatory cells and mediators into the peritoneal cavity [4] . Clinical diagnosis of peritonitis depends on the demonstration of changes in the peritoneal fluid cellular and biochemical constituents [2,3,4,5] . In normal, non-pregnant, Awassi sheep, peritoneal fluid TNCC values of 3.6×10 and 16% neutrophils were considered normal [6] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estas alterações podem ter ocorrido em resposta à perfuração do peritôneo por ocasião, principalmente, da paracentese da fossa paralombar direita, mais como reação ao trauma e/ou aspiração de ar ambiente para a cavidade peritoneal, uma vez que a paracentese ventral seriada não contribui para o aparecimento de alterações clínico-laboratoriais em eqüinos (JUSWIAK et al, 1991). Reforça essa hipótese o não aparecimento de bactérias na cultura do líquido após semeadura e incubação em estufa, uma vez que o isolamento de bactérias é um indicador definitivo de contaminação do peritôneo.…”
Section: Discussão E Conclusãounclassified