2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2017.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of robotic wheelchair control paradigm and interface on user performance, effort and preference: An experimental assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to meet user-dependent requirements in guiding behavior, usually explicit control objectives are minimized. Typically, these cost functions are task-oriented and use a set of performance indices such as the muscular effort (Hamaya et al, 2017) or the task completion time (Erdogan and Argall, 2017) to define the utility of the autonomous behavior of a system. As these control schemes commonly focus on the explicit performance of the user, user experience is notecessarily considered, which might have a strong impact on the user acceptance and long-term usage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to meet user-dependent requirements in guiding behavior, usually explicit control objectives are minimized. Typically, these cost functions are task-oriented and use a set of performance indices such as the muscular effort (Hamaya et al, 2017) or the task completion time (Erdogan and Argall, 2017) to define the utility of the autonomous behavior of a system. As these control schemes commonly focus on the explicit performance of the user, user experience is notecessarily considered, which might have a strong impact on the user acceptance and long-term usage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of SC have been explored in numerous fields in which the addition of a robot partner could benefit a human operator. For example, in assistive and rehabilitation robotics, researchers have explored the effects of SC on teleoperation of smart wheelchairs (Erdogan and Argall, 2017; Trieu et al, 2008) and robotic manipulators (Kim et al, 2006). Similarly, researchers have explored SC as it applies to the teleoperation of larger mobile robots and human–machine systems, such as cars (de Winter and Dodou, 2011) and aircraft (Matni and Oishi, 2008).…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, any signal sent to the system originates from the human partner . We use this filter because we are motivated by assistive robotics, in which prior research has shown that there is no consensus across users on desired assistance level (Erdogan and Argall, 2017). By allowing the user a high level of control freedom, the system encourages input from the human operator and restricts how much authority is granted to the autonomous partner.…”
Section: Mbscmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the action is transferred to the wheelchair controller to move it (Mougharbel et al, 2013). The system was further tested for effectiveness (Erdogan and Argall, 2017).…”
Section: Sip-and-puff Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%