2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.4766185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of sample resistivity on Kelvin probe force microscopy

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In figure 5(b), V CPD is approximately 5.6 V in AM-KPFM, which is significantly larger than in FM-and heterodyne AM-KPFMs. The V CPD in FM-and heterodyne AM-KPFMs (0.09 and 0.05 V) in this measurement is consistent with the experimental value of approximately 0.021 V, which was measured by Giessibl et al [44]. Because FM-and heterodyne AM-KPFMs are very sensitive to short-range interactions as described in section 2, these results suggest that the stray capacitance effect seriously affects AM-KPFM measurements due to the spatially averaged CPD between the cantilever and the macroscopic structures, including the insulating optical fibre, the stray capacitance around the cantilever and the metal electrodes of the sample holder.…”
Section: The Stray Capacitance Effectsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In figure 5(b), V CPD is approximately 5.6 V in AM-KPFM, which is significantly larger than in FM-and heterodyne AM-KPFMs. The V CPD in FM-and heterodyne AM-KPFMs (0.09 and 0.05 V) in this measurement is consistent with the experimental value of approximately 0.021 V, which was measured by Giessibl et al [44]. Because FM-and heterodyne AM-KPFMs are very sensitive to short-range interactions as described in section 2, these results suggest that the stray capacitance effect seriously affects AM-KPFM measurements due to the spatially averaged CPD between the cantilever and the macroscopic structures, including the insulating optical fibre, the stray capacitance around the cantilever and the metal electrodes of the sample holder.…”
Section: The Stray Capacitance Effectsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…64,75,76,83 Previously it was discussed that many factors can determine the detection of the atomic resolution during KPFM measurements, like resistivity of the sample or tiny metallic tip, distance between the tip and the sample, etc. 76,84 Therefore the presented results on the observation of the atomic contrast in the KPFM experiments on graphene-Ir(111) are still under discussion and can be the topic of further investigations.…”
Section: Kpfm Imagingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…An AC voltage with adjustable DC offset is applied between a conducting AFM tip and the sample electrode. The resulting electrostatic force is detected by a lock-in amplifier and a feedback circuit controls the dc tip potential until the CPD is compensated [26][27][28]. The contact potential difference is defined as…”
Section: Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy Analysis Of P-and N-ganmentioning
confidence: 99%