2014
DOI: 10.15414/afz.2014.17.03.87-89
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of serine protease on broiler growth and carcass quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
5
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in line with the body weight of birds assessed at d 1 -35, which was not influenced due to supplementing RSBM in diets. This result partially disagrees with Rada et al (2014), who reported that the meat parts of broilers were positively affected by the addition of microbial enzymes but the differences may be due to the nature of basal diets.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are in line with the body weight of birds assessed at d 1 -35, which was not influenced due to supplementing RSBM in diets. This result partially disagrees with Rada et al (2014), who reported that the meat parts of broilers were positively affected by the addition of microbial enzymes but the differences may be due to the nature of basal diets.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…Protease supplementation has been shown to improve poultry performance (Cowieson & Adeola, 2005;Rada et al, 2014), although most previous tests were conducted on diets containing only commercial SBM. As reported by scholars (Ravindran, 2013;Amerah, 2015), the mechanisms how the BWG and feed efficiency of birds were improved in the current study when supplementing their diets with microbial protease might also be due to the multi-faceted contribution of this enzyme, including complementarity effects with endogenous enzymes, contribution to reducing the gut viscosity, and by increasing the effectiveness of host (endogenous) enzymes and helping to alter the feed passage rate of the animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast with other findings, Rada et al (2014) and Olfati et al (2020) noted a significant impact of protease addition on carcass characteristics. Café et al (2002) declared an increase in abdominal fat by supplementing amylase and protease into the diet.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Results indicated no statistically significant differences among treatments in carcass characteristics and organ weight of broiler. Results of live, carcass, thigh, organ, and abdominal fat%, breast weight, and wings weight were in line with other researchers who reported no significant effect of protease supplementation in broiler diet on the carcass, abdominal fat, and thigh, breast weight, and wing weight ( Kamran et al , 2008 ; Rada et al , 2014 ). Similarly, Freitas et al (2011) and Mehmood et al (2017) reported no beneficial impact of protease addition in broiler diet on carcass yield, abdominal fat, and thigh, breast, and wing weight.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…But the results of studies conducted with protease supplementation are inconsistent because of the diversity of feed ingredients, the types and definitions of protease, and the differences in methodology (Rada et al, 2016;Mohammadigheisar & Kim, 2018). In recent years, several studies have investigated the effects on performance and nutrient digestibility of protease supplementation to LP diets for broilers (Favero et al, 2009;Fidelis et al, 2010;Angel et al, 2011;Freitas et al, 2011;Rada et al, 2014;Mahmood et al, 2017;Law et al, 2018;Mohammadigheisar & Kim 2019). However, little research has focused on the effects on growth performance of protease supplementation to diets that are reduced in crude protein and amino acids (Manangi et al, 2009;Rosa et al, 2009;Fru-Nji et al, 2011;Ndazigaruye et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%